|
Synchronicity
as a Sign
by
John P. Pratt
Have
you ever had an unusual event occur precisely at a meaningful time
and wondered if it was an answer to prayer?
Does
the Lord sometimes answer prayers by providing a "sign," that is,
a highly unlikely event? Or perhaps two more common events which
occur at the same time which seem to provide two witnesses of a
meaningful answer? Or are all "chance" coincidences entirely unrelated
to the prayer?
 |
Does God
use synchronicity to answer prayers?
Last Sunday
morning I prayed to know if I should write a Meridian article
on synchronicity as a possible communication method used by the
Lord. No immediate response came, and I typed part of my missionary
journal of some decades past. My brother soon phoned and expressed
concern about the condition of the world, including the growing
cancer of socialism. He specifically mentioned that he was seeking
reassurance that he was not overly concerned about a threat ignored
by most people. I mentioned that I had just transcribed from my
journal a special lesson I had presented to a socialist member of
the Church on my mission, based on the April 1966 conference address
of Pres. Marion G. Romney about socialism being Satan's counterfeit
of God's plan. My brother was astounded because he had just read
that very talk an hour before. I have not thought about that talk
since my mission and he could not remember ever having read it previously.
What are the chances that we both would be focused on the same four-decade-old
conference talk at the same time that morning? To us it was meaningful,
which qualifies it as an example of synchronicity, as explained
below. Was it an answer to my prayer? And did it give my brother
the reassurance he sought? Both of us think so. But are we just
imposing meaning on what was really just a chance coincidence? Let
us consider whether or not the Lord might sometimes communicate
through such precisely timed events.
Degrees
of Revelation
There
are apparently degrees of strength of revelation. Because scientists
like to classify phenomena as a first step to understanding them,
let us attempt to classify revelations according to degrees of strength.
Open
Visions
Perhaps
the strongest revelations are those angelic visitations or open
visions which occur in broad daylight. The scriptures contain many
examples, such as the visitations to Moses or Joseph Smith. These
high-profile revelations seem to be given when the individual will
have to look back in some future day of testing and remember that
it was more than a "good feeling" that got him there. Most of us
will live an entire life without experiencing even one such powerful
vision, perhaps because such is not required for our life's mission.
Indeed, the Lord explained to Miriam, the sister of Moses, that
Moses was in a class above that of most prophets and prophetesses
(such as herself), precisely because of these higher level communications
(Num 12:6-8).
 |
Samuel heard
the voice of the Lord.
Dreams
or Voices
A
seemingly less powerful revelation can come in the form of a dream
or a voice, such as when the wise men were warned in a dream from
God not to revisit Herod (Mat. 2:12), or Samuel heard a voice calling
him (1 Samuel 3:4-10). I've met several people who have experienced
such communications at least a few times, often with the result
that their life was saved by obeying the warning. For example, on
the farm my uncle heard a voice commanding him to jump, which he
did just before a huge hay hook fell from a crane right where he
had been standing.
Feelings
and Impressions
Now
we come to a level where most of us experience celestial communications
much more frequently. There are many times when one has a "feeling"
or "impression" to do something. Perhaps it is only to take a different
road, only to discover that there was an accident on the usual road.
Sometimes the feeling is a "whispering" or the "still small voice"
of the Holy Ghost, and the impression is so distinct that it is
almost like a voice. Other times it is only a feeling. In both cases
the intensity and clarity of information is below that of a dream
or distinct voice. Thus, these revelations are both less intense
but also much more frequent than the more powerful communications.
Signs
Another
method of communication used by the Lord is the "sign." A sign is
a very unusual occurrence, rare enough to draw attention to itself.
Sometimes the word "sign" includes the meaning of "miracle", such
as in a healing (as in Mark 16:17-18). In this article, however,
the word sign does not necessarily refer to a miracle, but only
to something very unusual. Often a sign is something that conforms
perfectly to the usual flow of nature, but it still is unusual enough
to demand attention. Let us consider two scriptural examples.
 |
The sign
of the dove at the Baptism of Jesus.
The Sign of
the Dove. Perhaps the best known sign in scripture is that given
at the time of the Savior's baptism. A dove flew down from the sky
and landed on the shoulder of the Savior, which was highly unusual,
but not really miraculous. While it is sometimes thought that the
Holy Ghost transformed himself into a dove, the Prophet Joseph Smith
explained that such was not the case. Rather, the dove was instituted
before the creation of the earth as a sign to symbolize the
presence of the Holy Ghost (TPJS, p. 276). Thus, the presence
of the dove testified of the presence of the Holy Ghost.
Lying
in a Manger. At the birth of the Savior, the angel needed to
tell the shepherds how to recognize the newborn king when they found
him in Bethlehem. How did the angel do that? By giving them a sign:
"And this shall be a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped
in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger" (Luke 2:12). Now when was
the last time you saw a baby resting in a ox feeder? That would
clearly be an unusual sight, but it would not be classified as a
miracle. What made it a "sign" was the fact that it was predicted
by the angel as a way to communicate that the shepherds had found
the correct infant.
Having
looked at three more powerful levels of revelation, let us now consider
what I propose may be a fourth, and perhaps the most subtle form
of revelation: synchronicity.
 |
The
synchronicity of the lunar eclipse at the Crucifixion when the
moon "turned to blood."
Synchronicity
Now
we come to the subject of this article: synchronicity. What does
that word mean? The word "synchronous" refers to events which happen
at the same time. The word "synchronicity" adds two restrictions
to that meaning. First, neither of the events can cause the other.
Scientifically stated, the events are not "causally related." Secondly,
in an attempt to distinguish these events from those which happen
purely by chance, the definition also stipulates that the events
be a "meaningful" coincidence.[1]
This is the sticky part for a scientist. Meaningful in what way?
Meaningful to whom? It refers to the coincidence of events occurring
at a time which was meaningful to observers of the events. It other
words, two events occur at the same time, in which one does not
appear to have caused the other, but both events appear to indicate
some meaning to the observer. But isn't science supposed to deal
with "objective reality" independent of meanings attached to events
by observers?
 |
A solar
eclipse is breathtaking.
Because this definition opens the door to the entire field of superstitions,
omens and portents, where, for example, the appearance of a comet
might be interpreted to mean the downfall of the emperor, the question
arises as to why this word has been introduced into the discipline
of science where causality has reigned supreme. The reason is that
it was only until about 1920-1930 that the world of physics was
based almost entirely on the principal of causality. The universe
was viewed as a great machine where everything occurred because
of forces acting on objects, which in turn were caused by previous
forces acting on objects.
All
of that changed with the advent of quantum mechanics where non-causal
events suddenly appeared everywhere, especially on the atomic level.
Determinism was replaced by the newly enthroned monarch of "probabilty."
Even a brief review of these phenomena is beyond the scope of this
article, but today it would be hard to find a physicist who believes
in a deterministic universe.
Jung
and Pauli
 |
Psychologist
Carl Jung coined the word "synchronicity."
The concept
of synchronicity was born from the meeting in 1928 and subsequent
friendship of the renowned psychologist Carl Jung with the famous
physicist Wolfgang Pauli. Pauli had been a great force in the formulation
with Werner Heisenberg of quantum mechanics. Jung had studied Eastern
and ancient philosophies where, for example, people would cast lots
to determine who should perform a task or who was the guilty party
(compare 1 Nephi 3:11, Jonah 1:7). Jung noticed that such practices
were often more accurate than chance would predict, and Pauli was
able to provide partial physical explanations of how that could
be possible. It took them years to have the courage to publish a
jointly authored book on such a controversial topic, but they finally
did so in 1952.[2]
It was Jung who coined the word "synchronicity," which he defined
as "the coincidence in time of two or more causally unrelated events
which have the same or similar meaning." He also noted that synchronicity
"is the prejudice of the East, causality is the modern prejudice
of the West."[3]
He also proposed that an absolute "meaning" for such coincidences
might be provided by a "collective unconscious" mind of all mankind.
 |
Physics
Nobel Laureate Wolfgang Pauli
This subject
is still too controversial for most modern scientists. Most probably
do not even know the word "synchronicity," and most would reject
the concept as pseudo-scientific if they did. They continue to believe
that all synchronicity is just the result of chance occurrences
and that no events have "meaning." For example, they would relegate
all unusual celestial events to mere chance, and think it ludicrous
that some sort of "meaning" be associated with them. But that is
not what the scriptures teach. That is, whereas we might not think
of a comet as being a "sign" of anything, let us remember that the
Star of Bethlehem was given as a sign of the birth of the Savior.
Herod's astrologers did not discern the true meaning, but the important
point is that there was indeed a true meaning, and it was discerned
by the wise men. Moreover, we have yet to see the "grand sign of
the Son of Man heaven" heralding his return. The Prophet Joseph
Smith said that it will be dismissed by the world as merely "a planet,
a comet, etc." so that most will totally miss the significance (TPJS,
p. 287). Keeping these fine distinctions in mind, let us now return
to the above scriptural examples in the light of the concept of
synchronicity.
The
Sign of the Dove
In
the sign of the dove, it was not just that a dove landed on the
Savior's shoulder one day when he was cutting wood as a carpenter's
apprentice. It was that it happened when the Savior had just been
baptized and also when a voice was heard from heaven declaring,
"This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased" (Mat. 3:16-17).
Thus, the sign of the presence of the Holy Ghost was given precisely
when the voice of the Father was also heard as a sign of his presence.
This coincidence of timing, combined with the meaningful interpretation
relating to the Holy Ghost, qualifies this sign as an excellent
example of synchronicity.
 |
The shepherds
arrived when Jesus was in the manger.
Lying
in a Manger
And
what about the baby lying in the manger? What if the shepherds had
arrived to see an empty manger, with Mary holding the infant Jesus?
It just wouldn't have been the same if Mary had needed to explain
that Jesus had been lying in the manger only moments before they
had arrived. No, we are explicitly told that the shepherds found
"the babe lying in a manger" (Luke 2:16). Thus, precise timing is
often involved, in this case involving the arrival of the shepherds.
The meaningfulness of the sign was provided by the angel
. Without
those words, finding the babe in a manger would probably not have
been interpreted as a sign, and even might have disqualified the
infant in their minds from having been considered as a newborn king.
Other
Scriptural Examples
There
are many scriptural examples of synchronicity, but they are not
the obvious miracles performed. Most of the "signs" which follow
the saints, such as healing the sick, casting out devils and speaking
in tongues come as direct results as of priesthood authority being
exercised. Thus, there is a definite "cause and effect" relationship
which disqualifies them as being examples of synchronicity. And
it is the same with the greater miracles such as Moses parting the
Red Sea. Of course, Pharaoh might say that it was just a chance
coincidence that the sea happened to part just when Moses stretched
out his hand, but then Pharaoh had thought that all of the plagues
were the result of chance or magic. But such miracles were clear
examples of the power of God being exercised.
 |
Synchronicity
as Joseph sold to Ishmaelites.
So where are
the examples of synchronicity? They are all at a much more subtle
level, which really do appear to be chance coincidences, but which
which have great meaning, either to the observer or to the future
course of history. Some apparent chance coincidences occurred when
the Midianite traders just happened by as Joseph was about to be
killed by his brothers, or when the Pharaoh's daughter just happened
to find the baby Moses. Both of these events changed the course
of history to such an extent that surely the hand of the Lord must
have been involved in an unseen way.
Peter's
Denial
A
classic example is when the Savior prophesied that Peter, who had
said he would die for Jesus, would deny him three times before the
cock would crow (Luke 22:34). When Peter later denied him the third
time, "immediately, while he yet spake, the cock crew. And the Lord
turned, and looked upon Peter" (Luke 22:60-62). The crowing of the
cock was not caused by Peter's denial, but occurred at the same
time. Because of the Savior's prophecy, that synchronicity had such
meaning to Peter that he not only wept bitterly, he became one of
the most courageous apostles. He later cheerfully suffered being
manacled to a post in a horrible, rat-infested torture-chamber dungeon
for nine months. He could not lie down to sleep, there was absolutely
no light, and the stench of rotting human flesh must have been insufferable.
Finally he was crucified upside-down in Rome in AD 67, and all of
this to avoid again denying the Savior.[4]
Apparently the synchronicity of the cock crowing had a truly profound,
life-changing effect on this great apostle.
 |
Can
a meteor be an answer to prayer?
Synchronicity
and Prayer
Let
us consider a few examples of synchronicity in everyday life. A
friend of mine told me that he had prayed to know whether to join
the Church for some time with no apparent response. One night as
he looked at the stars and contemplated the question, he saw a brilliant
shooting star streak across the heavens. He asked me, as an experienced
member of the Church, if that might have been an answer to his prayer.
What would you have told him?
I
asked him what he felt about it. He replied that he had felt it
was a direct answer to prayer, and that it led to him being baptized.
But now he wasn't so sure, because now most answers come to him
as a feeling or impression, rather than what could be merely a chance
occurrence. What do you think? How should I have replied? What happened
to me years later seemed to answer this question once and for all
in my mind.
 |
Synchronicity
at Sunrise.
Precise
Timing
Once
I felt very alone, even though I was on a ward campout. It was early
in the morning, and I was up before anyone else. I thought in my
heart, "I wish that I knew that the Lord knew me personally." Suddenly,
into my mind burst the strong impression, "Just turn around and
you will know." It was so strong that I immediately turned, having
no idea what I might see. At that very moment, the first flash of
sunrise appeared on the horizon. Sunrises are always a spiritual
experience for me, and I have sat for hours watching for that very
first light to herald the coming day. But I was unprepared for the
surge of Spirit which gushed through my entire being at that moment.
I knew that the Lord had spoken directly to me and answered my secret
longing.
In
these examples, one could ask, was the falling star going to fall
if my friend hadn't been looking? Was the sun going to rise that
morning if I hadn't turned around? Of course, these events would
happen according to the laws of nature, so no miraculous event occurred.
Then what was it that made them so important to us that we felt
that a prayer had been answered? To me the answer is twofold. First,
it was in the timing. Both of us had been thinking about
the concern at the very time that the event happened. And secondly,
each event was accompanied by the spiritual impression that it was
indeed an answer.
 |
Synchronicity
as Moses is discovered.
Scripture
Study
One
of the most common forms of synchronicity as a sign answering prayer
involves scripture study. We have been counseled many times by our
spiritual leaders to study the scriptures daily, and that by doing
so we will not only gain more knowledge of God's dealings with mankind,
but also we will receive answers to our prayers as we read. There
seem to be two distinct ways this happens. First, during the normal
course of study for that day, one suddenly encounters a scripture
that explicitly answers the question. Even if the scripture doesn't
exactly apply, the Spirit will often testify of the answer, making
the scripture appear to precisely relate to the question at hand.
Secondly, sometimes the "random page" method has been found to produce
startlingly accurate and meaningful results. I know some people
who will pray about a subject and then open the scriptures to a
random page and point to a random place on the page and read that
verse. They have found that more often than not the verse applies
exactly to their question. While I personally am usually in the
first, more methodical camp, I had one notable experience with this
method. As a youth, I had prayed to know if a certain man's teachings
were inspired. One morning after prayers, the distinct thought entered
my mind to open the Doctrine and Covenants to get my answer. As
I was leaving the house to catch the school bus, I grabbed a D&C
and opened it randomly. My eyes fell on the verse that says that
whoever forbids us to eat meat is not ordained of God (D&C 49:18).
I instantly had my answer, because this man had taught that we were
breaking the laws of God by eating meat. Immediately I lost all
interest in what had been his exciting "revealed" teachings, because
I knew for myself that he had been deceived.
One
advantage of this "random" method seems to be that allows the inclusion
of unusually rare verses to be found. That is the only verse in
all of scripture, as far as I know, that explicitly says what it
does. In my normal reading, I might only read that verse once in
four years, whereas the random method led me to it in an instant.
Everyday
Examples
Suppose
you are shopping and see an old friend from high school. Is that
synchronicity? Probably not. After all, unusual events do happen,
and random chance does appear to exist. But what if the old friend
turns out to know of an opening at their place of employment which
is just what you have been praying for help in finding? Now the
dimension of "meaning" is added to the coincidence, which may well
qualify it both as an example of synchronicity and also as an answer
to prayer. The purpose of this article is to suggest that the Lord
might use synchronicity as a "sign" to indicate an answer to prayer.
After all, you might look for a job in many places. One way the
Lord could indicate which job is best might be to include an unusual
coincidence as a sign. Of course, in the final analysis, one needs
to make the decision and then pray for confirmation (D&C 9:8).
The main point here is that sometimes a rare event might point the
way to notice one possibility more than others.
As
a scientist, I would love to be able to analyze and categorize these
examples more perfectly, but there seem to be so many variations
that I must consider this article only as a first attempt at drawing
broad lines to help understand what seems to commonly occur. My
main point is to encourage us all become more aware of the possibility
that the Lord might use the unusual timing of events to be an indication
of an answer to prayer. But it also seems prudent to expect that
any such event should also be confirmed by the witness of the Spirit,
testifying that such is the case. As I searched the scriptures,
most cases recorded involved either a prophecy being fulfilled or
some other second witness. The Lord has promised that he always
works through two or more witnesses. The most I'm suggesting in
this article is that synchronicity might be allowed to count as
one witness.
Conclusion
Synchronicity
refers to "meaningful coincidences." While it was introduced as
a scientific concept worthy of study and experiment, it has been
ignored and discredited by the scientific world because of the atheistic
assumption that chance rules the universe and also because of the
difficulty in ascribing an absolute "meaning" to events. This article
suggests that the Spirit can provide the meaning, and that the Lord
might sometimes use synchronicity as a sign in answer to prayer.
Whereas most prayers appear to be answered with feelings or impressions,
the precise timing of an unusual event may contribute as another
witness of the correctness of the answer. Moreover, such events
can help precisely specify one of many alternatives. We might all
do well to be open to the possibility that God might employ synchronicity
as a means of answering prayer.
Notes
- One
definition is "Meaningful coincidence, significantly related
patterns of chance," from Chetwynd, Tom, A Dictionary of
Symbols (New York: Granada, 1982), quoted by Peat, F. David,
Synchronicity: The Bridge Between Matter and Mind (New
York: Bantam Books, 1987), p. 1.
- C.
G. Jung and W. Pauli, The Interpretation and Nature of the
Psyche, trans. R.F.C. Hull and P. Silz (New York: Pantheon,
1955).
- Peat,
Synchronicity, p. 22. The last example of synchronicity
in Pauli's life was that, after spending countless hours failing
to explain what is call the "fine structure constant, " (equal
to 1/137), he was admitted to room 137 in the hospital. He is
said to have remarked, "I will never get out of here," and died
shortly thereafter. Thus, it is not just the coincidence of
the numbers and of the timing of that room being the next available,
but the fact that it was "meaningful" to the observer which
qualifies it as synchronicity (Peat, Synchronicity, p.
29).
- McBirnie,
William S., The Search for the Twelve Apostles (Wheaton,
Ill.: Tyndale House, 1973), p. 64-67. This book contains a wealth
of well documented accounts of the ministries and eventual demise
of all of the apostles, except John, for whom no remains have
been found. They truly went and taught "all nations" (Mark 16:19).
Click
here to sign up for Meridian's FREE email updates.
© 2004 Meridian
Magazine. All Rights Reserved.
|