Click here to find out more
 


Click Here to Shop  -- Meridian Marketplace

LDSGetaway.com
LDSPro.com




Click here to learn more






Share the article on this page with a friend.
Click here.
Meridian Magazine : : Home

Heard Enough about the Subprime Mortgage Markets Yet?
Richard P. Halverson

By now everyone has heard of the subprime mortgage “crisis.”  Why is it a “crisis,” and what does it mean for you?

First, if you already have a mortgage — or specifically a subprime mortgage — you don’t have to worry.  As long as you make your payments, you are fine.  This is true even if the organization that made the loan goes out of business.

Second, it will affect you if you are trying to get a mortgage.  This is particularly true if you are a subprime borrower.  You will find it harder to get a mortgage, and what you will find may be more expensive and require a larger down payment.

Third, will this cause a recession?  An economic slow down may result.  If recession does occur its causes will be many including the fact that the economy still has cycles.  The subprime market may prove to be the classic “straw breaking the Camel’s back” — but it will not be the only straw.

Beware of Headlines

For months most people have been barraged with almost daily headlines suggesting that the world, or at least the financial markets, will collapse because of the subprime mortgage market.  Beware of headlines.  Let me illustrate with this article and inserted comments

The Headline

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — The number of defaults on mortgage payments rose to a three-year high in the second quarter in California, a 67% increase from the year earlier period, according to DataQuick, a real estate data-compiling firm.

Comment. Sounds pretty ominous.

The Article’s First Paragraph Begins:

Lenders sent 20,752 default notices to homeowners across the Golden State, up 10.5% from 18,778 the previous quarter and up 67.2% from 12,408 in the second quarter of 2005.

COMMENT.  Still sound ominous.

The Article Goes on to Say:

"This is an important trend to watch but doesn't strike us as ominous," said Marshall Prentice, DataQuick's president. "We would have to see defaults roughly double from today's level before they would begin to impact home values much."

Because the number of defaults had fallen to extreme lows in recent years, it was widely expected that they would start spiking up as home-price appreciation slowed, he said. By Nick Godt, Dow Jones MarketWatch Aug 3, 2006

COMMENT.  Doesn’t sound so ominous after all. In fact, the numbers are up because they “had fallen to extreme lows.”   Note: this article was a year ago.  The trend in delinquencies has indeed continued up.  However, as of March 2007 the most recent data we have subprime delinquencies were still well below their peak in June 2002.  (Source Bloomberg News — DLQTSUBP Index)

Good News/Bad News

Okay — that is the good news.  Things are not nearly as bad as the headlines suggest, and for most people the word “crisis” is not applicable.  We are not going to have huge numbers of mortgage-paying Americans dragged out of their homes and thrown into the streets.

The bad news is there really are problems associated with the subprime mortgage market.  They are mostly technical, dealing with the way world financial markets work.  The way financial markets are wired means a problem like this can send shock waves through the entire system. 

The subprime issue is also a problem for many people who work in mortgage lending, real estate sales, construction, and so on.  The housing market got ahead of itself and now it will cool down.

Technical Problems with Exotic New Financial Technology

What is going on in the financial markets is not easy to explain.  It involves fancy new financial technology.  Frequently, when there is fancy new technology it leads to excessive excitement and misuse — resulting in an old-fashioned speculative bubble and just as old-fashioned speculative collapse. 

Here are a few things you should know.

Subprime Mortgages. You should know that subprime mortgages are not new.  There have always been lenders willing to lend to people with bad credit.  Of course, they charged much higher interest rates, knowing that a higher percentage of such borrowers would default.

Securitization. You should know that for some years now there has been a growing trend in the securitization of mortgages (and every other type of consumer loan).  This means your lender does not keep your mortgage the way lenders use to.  Your mortgage will be sold and packaged with other mortgages into huge pools and sold like a single bond. This is known as .

These days, more than 70% of the mortgages are securitized. Because of their size and complex structures these mortgage-backed securities, as they are called, are nothing you or I would be interested for our personal portfolios.  But they are attractive to huge pension funds, insurance companies, large foundations, and many other investments pools with billions of dollars to invest.

Securitization has been around for a number of years, but technology has moved it to whole new levels.  Using powerful computers they can break these mortgages apart and reassemble them in almost any way an investor might like. 

For example, they can strip out just the interest payments for a particular month for a whole pool of mortgages put them in a package and sell a security that looks like a zero coupon bond with interest payment.  They can strip out just the principle portion of the payments and package those into a separate bond.  They can mix and match mortgages of different qualities, different geographical locations, and different types of properties. 

There is almost no end of the ways your simple mortgage can be taken apart and put into various investment products, each attractive to some institutional investor out there.  And this is exactly why it is done, to appeal to many different types of investors — investors that would not normally have any interest in holding a home mortgage in their portfolio.  This opens up vast new sources of money for mortgages.  That is good for people that want to buy homes.

Hedge funds. You should know there are many large investors interested in these mortgage-backed securities, but of all those investors, none have been growing as rapidly as the so-called hedge funds.  You likely have heard of hedge funds.  They are everywhere.  (I run one.) 

Generally, a news article simply describes them as large, unregulated, highly secretive investment pools.  Those things are true.  The reason nobody describes them further is that there are so many, they are so complex and they invest in so many things they cannot be described in a few hundred words or even a few hundred pages.  Some do equities, some do currencies, some do commodities, some do art, movies, royalties, even patents.  Many do exotic mortgage backed securities.  Some do everything and some invest only in other hedge funds. 

They are unregulated because most are set up as limited partnerships and often in offshore tax havens.  The law says they can only sell partnerships to wealthy sophisticated investors and institutions who theoretically know what they are doing and therefore do not need the government to look out for them.  (We’ll see if that theory gets tested in here with all the hedge fund problems that keep cropping up.)  They are secretive because all the managers think they are smarter than everyone else and have a proprietary investment approach that they do not want stolen.  (I fit that category.)

You should know that hedge funds have been growing rapidly in recent years, attracting billions and billions of dollars.  This has given them a ferocious appetite for new investments.

Remember there is no easy way to generalize about hedge funds or even get data on them.  However, most of them are trying to produce steady above-average returns in good and bad markets.  To find the high returns many of them have been attracted to securities backed by subprime mortgages. 

Remember, by the time these mortgages have gone through the securitization process they have become highly exotic.  Managers of these hedge funds are brilliant, with IQ’s off the charts and working for some of the best firms on Wall Street.  They know these highly exotic securities carry highly exotic risks.  They seek to hedge or offset these risks selling short (borrowing and then selling a security you do not own with hope of buying it back at a lower price) a security that should go up in value if the subprime mortgage security goes down in value. 

A very simple example might include buying a mortgage backed security with a duration of 10 years and hedging that by shorting 10-year government bond futures.  Elaborate computer models have been built to select and control these investments.  Frequently, the computer enters the trade untouched by human hands.  These computer programs represent very new and very powerful financial technology.

Another interesting thing about hedge funds is that typically they can borrow money.  How much they can borrow often depends on regulations and how convincing they are to the banks that their investments and computer models will work.  For example, the partners may invest $1 billion in a hedge fund.  The hedge fund will go to the bank and borrow more perhaps $4 or $6 or $10 billion or more.  This creates substantial leverage.

Perfect Storm

This all works until something goes wrong.  The Federal Reserve has been raising interest rates for more than three years, trying to contain inflation.  Rising interest rates always hits the housing and other interest sensitive markets first — that is what the FED is trying to do.  The effort to cool housing did not work very well this time because of all the money chasing mortgage-backed securities.  Eventually, however, rising rates did have an effect, especially with mortgage borrowers that had purchased Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARM).  As interest rates rose their monthly payments increased.  This often hit people who couldn’t realistically make the payment they already had, and defaults increased.

In the meantime, the pressure on hedge funds to generate high returns had created an abnormally large market for subprime mortgages.  Just think of all the ads you have heard in the past several years.  “Poor credit, no credit, bankrupt, we’ll approve you — no questions asked.”  The good news is that a lot of deserving people with an unfortunate credit history got approved.  The bad news is a lot of not-so-deserving people with an unfortunate credit history got approved.

I assure you, the smart guys in the subprime mortgage market knew these loans were risky.  But even smart guys get caught up in a speculative frenzy.  This means these mortgage-backed securities were mispriced.  This was easy to do because these securities are so exotic and do not trade on organized exchanges it is very difficult to price them properly.  Then throw in the speculative enthusiasm on top of that.  This meant borrowers were getting money too easily and too cheaply, and investors were paying too much for the mortgage-backed securities. (Oh yeah, and there was some downright fraud and falsified documents along the way, but these well publicized anecdotal incidents were on the margin. Remember, beware of headlines.)

Because we are not allowed look inside the computer models (I won’t show you mine) we do not know whether the models failed or over-enthusiastic managers with pressure to produce big returns overrode the computers.  We do know increasing defaults and mispriced securities meant losses began to appear.  We also know the computer-generated hedges either didn’t work or were inadequate.  Hedge funds began to experience losses. 

Then the negative effects of the leverage (the borrowed money) began to kick in. Whatever losses were showing up were magnified many times over.  For example, the subprime mortgage may have lost 5% of its value.  In the world of investing, 5% is no big deal.  But if you are leveraged 10 to 1, the 5% decline is suddenly a 50% decline.  That makes investors and bankers nervous, especially when they know it may be much worse because of the difficulty in pricing the assets.  Often the hedge fund could not be certain what their portfolio was worth.

This leads to a classic “run on the bank.”  Bankers and partners are trying to pull out their money and the hedge funds are trying to raise money by selling securities that suddenly no one wants to buy.

I have been picking on hedge funds, but they are not the only people investing in subprime mortgages.  The hedge funds were important and in many ways were driving the market, both up and down.  But many mainline banks, insurance companies, savings and loans, pension funds, foundations and others also invested heavily in them to improve their own returns.

The Rich and the Pros get Hurt

It truly has been a classic speculative blow-off — except this one has been perpetrated almost entirely on and by professionals.  You know — the folks who usually scoff at the little guy that doesn’t know what he is doing, gets caught up in a frenzy, and loses his 401k?  Remember, the Internet speculation 7 or 8 years ago, for example?  Lots of ordinary people lost a lot of money in that one.  Well, this speculative blow-off with all its losses belongs almost entirely to the wealthy.  This time, do not even expect any heartrending headlines.  A wealthy investor losing money in a hedge fund partnership does not generate much sympathy on the evening news.

The FED to the Rescue

Because financial markets are so intertwined what really is just an ordinary problem to be worked through can quickly turn into a full blown financial crisis.  That has been occurring here.  As I write, central banks around the globe are pouring money into the financial system worldwide.  It is way too early to know if they have already succeeded or whether it will require months of effort.  In the end they will be able to contain it.

I want to make a point about the intervention of central banks like the Federal Reserve.  Their purpose is not to bail out unwise investors — especially some of these wealthy investors.  Neither is it their goal to save the subprime mortgage market so that people who can’t really afford a mortgage will keep getting them.  It isn’t even their goal to assure full employment in the real estate and construction markets.  Their goal is to prevent the financial markets from melting down.  Having the markets seize up and quit working is not in anyone’s best interest.

I said at the outset it will be (and already is) more difficult to find a mortgage, especially a subprime mortgage.  Another classic characteristic of a speculative blow-off is that many participants swear off the market completely.  One might think investors would just scale back a little bit to more appropriate levels, but frequently it doesn’t work that way.  Frequently, the board says, “No more, get out completely!”  Thus the money available for mortgages (and subprime mortgages particularly) can shrink sharply in a short period of time.

This too will pass.  In the mean time be prepared for whatever may follow.  Reduce your debt and improve your work performance.   “..if ye are prepared ye shall not fear.” (D&C 38:30)

P.S. My firm does not participate in any mortgage-backed securities, so I can be philosophical this time.  And as always all these opinions are mine alone and do not represent those of Meridian any company or organization I am affiliated with — or even those of my wife.


About the Author:

Richard P. Halverson
Meridian Financial Editor

Richard P. Halverson is a founding partner of the investment company Great Northern Capital. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in Banking and Finance from the University of Utah and a Master of Business Administration degree from Harvard University where he was named a Baker Scholar. He served on the following committees for the Association of Investment Management and Research (AIMR): as a member of The Standards and Practices Committee, 1981-1990; as a member and chairman of the Professional Conduct Committee, 1982-1993; as chairman of the Ethics Awareness and Education Committee, 1993-1996. In 1994, he received the Daniel J. Forrestall III Leadership Award from The Association for Investment Management and Research (AIMR) for his work in the area of ethics in the investment profession.

He first became interested in personal finance while serving as a Bishop. During the day he worked in the world of billion dollar finance, but during the evenings he found himself immersed in the more difficult world of family finance. This led him to write the book Financial Freedom. He is also a contributing author to the McGraw Hill Real Estate Handbook and Smart Money Magazine. He claims to be proof that you can be in the investment business and still not get rich! He resides in Minnesota and is the father of seven children.

What do you think?
Related Articles:

Money Wise Article Archive

Format for Print
Click here

 

Share the article on this page with a friend.
Click here.