It Is Not The Government’s Deficits That Worry Me.
It
Is All The Personal Debts Being Racked Up By The Citizens!
By
Richard P. Halverson
A
cursory review of past national campaigns will reveal that government
deficits are an issue in all of them. The parties tend to switch
places over time on who is blaming whom for the deficit. Their
convictions tend to depend on who is in power at the time and
what the money is being spent on. So it comes as little surprise
that the federal deficit is an issue again in this campaign.
At this particular point in history it’s not the government’s
deficits that worry me, it is all the
personal debts being racked up by the citizens!
This
article is not political in nature. It is not intended to offer
an opinion on which party is correct in this campaign. This
article is about personal consumer debt.
Government and Personal Debt Are Different
I
can’t say I have ever heard anyone say the reason for their
reckless spending and personal debt was because of the government’s
bad example. I have heard many times people compare the government
to a private individual. The argument goes that if you and
I need to pay our bills and balance our budgets so should the
government. The argument is half right. That is you and I
do need to pay our bills and balance our budgets. However,
within limits, the government does not need to. There
is a simple reason. You and I have many timelines in our life.
These include such things as reaching the end of our productive
years and of course the ultimate timeline of dying. The government
is organized to continue indefinitely. Consequently, the government
can plan to roll over its debt sometime in the future rather
than repay it. Individuals can’t – at least not forever.
I
am sure I am already digging myself into a hole with some readers.
Let me be clear. I am conservative. When it comes to governments
I wish more of them (any of them) operated with the fiscal responsibility
of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. However,
from a purely economic and financial point of view, when it
comes to organizations like governments and corporations it
is perfectly prudent even wise in many cases to have some debt.
It is appropriate for the federal government to run deficits
to stimulate the economy and to meet the demands of national
emergencies.
The Trends in Consumer Debt Are a Lot Worse Than the Government’s
There
is another reason why I am less worried about the government
than its citizens. The deficit in the U.S. is at a new record high in actual dollars but as a
percentage of Gross National Product it is within historical
ranges, as the chart below illustrates. Gross National Product
is one measure of the nation’s ability to repay its debts.
Consumer
debt, however, is hitting new records both in actual dollars
as well as a percentage of personal disposable income. In this
case personal disposable income is a good measure of consumers’
ability to repay their debts.

Consumers
have run up their debts, enslaving increasing percentages of
their disposable income to debt repayments. At the same time
they have reduced their savings to almost zero.
It
appears that the government’s long-term trends in borrowing
are relatively flat. The consumers of this nation, however,
are borrowing more and saving less all the time.
The easy availability of debt breaks down discipline
I
said above that from a purely economic and financial point of
view there are times when it is wise for the government to run
a deficit and borrow money. Efforts to stimulate the economy
are an example. There are also times when individual citizens
are probably wise to borrow money. Buying a home is an example.
The
main problem with running deficits either at the government
or the individual consumer level is that when it is easy to
borrow, financial discipline tends to disappear. There are
always more things that would be nice to spend money on than
there are dollars available to pay for them with. That is true
whether it is the government or the individual citizen. The
government, being the government, finds it very easy to borrow.
I am certain that has lead to a lot poor fiscal discipline over
the years. “Why say no to my constituents when the money can
be easily borrowed?” Unfortunately, it works this way for individuals
as well. Clever modern financial products like credit cards
and equity lines of credit have made it easy for the consumer
to borrow. “Why say no to myself when the money can be easily
borrowed?” The easy debt financial breakdown occurs both with
the government and consumers. But the charts above suggest
the breakdown is a lot worse with consumers than with the government.
The Government Can just Vote Itself Money
There
is another reason why the government deficits are not as worrisome
as consumer debts, at least in terms of whether they can be
paid off or not. If the government needs more money to pay
its debts, it can simply pass a tax law and take it from the
citizens. The individual citizens, on the other hand, when
faced with a revenue crisis, cannot just pass a law and raise
their salaries.
If
one really wants to imagine the perfect financial storm, imagine
a time when the government decides to vote itself more money
by raising taxes on the citizens so it can pay down its debt,
right at the time the citizens need every last penny just to
repay their own debts. It is fairly easy to imagine. Some would
argue that if all the facts were on the table we are there right
now. I’m not sure whether the government or the citizens will
be to blame.
Future Generations Get Stuck with the Bill
One
frequent argument against government debt is that the next generation
gets stuck with the bill. It should be noted that we are already
the next generation several times removed from our spendthrift
ancestors. Government borrowing was not invented in the past
few weeks. And, as I have argued, it really hasn’t increased
as a percentage of the Gross National Product. So, we are still
paying for parts of the New Deal, the Wars, the Great Society
and many other government programs that made sense to our ancestors.
Rolling the obligation into the future is just part of a continuing
operation. Our ancestors have died and left us with the bill
and we hardly notice it.
It
does not work this way for individuals. Some day the credit
card balance must be paid, the car loan must be satisfied and
the LASIK surgery bill comes due. Dying and leaving it to your
loved ones is a terrible thing to inflict on them. Some feel
living through it isn’t much better. Stress from debt leads
to health problems, marriage problems and even spiritual problems.
So
vote for who you think is best for the job. With regards to
the Presidency, the next President is very likely to see smaller
deficits as a percentage of Gross National Product for awhile.
That is because the economy is improving and should continue
to strengthen for some time. But regardless of who is in the
White House I hope that individual citizens will begin to reverse
their long-term trends of more spending and less saving. That
would be a real benefit for the next generation.