| 
Destroying
Angels
By Davis Bitton
A recurring threat to the survival
of the Latter-day Saints who settled in the Great Basin was insects.
We all know of the horrendous invasion of crickets in 1848 and
the miracle of the gulls that saved at least part of the crop.
But the scourge did not end with that year. Crickets came on other
occasions, and grasshoppers or locusts, and the distinction was
not always clearly made, continued to come, not every year, but
every few years.
The Deseret News called
them "destroying angels ... armed and legged and winged —
as orthodox angels should be — and fully equipped for war."
Bishop Alfred Cordon described a
Pioneer Day celebration in 1868 with its flags and banners, races
and processions, and a concluding dance in the evening. "There
was nothing to mar our peace only the thought that the locust
were destroying our crops. The locusts were very numerous. They
eat our clothing as we sat in the Bowery."
John Fell Squires said the hoppers
would eat everything of a green nature right down to window blinds
and green paint. "If a male or female appeared out doors
dressed in green they would be driven to cover or uncover in less
than no time. You must remember this, if they could eat all the
bark from a shade tree which they did, it would not take them
long to eat up a fellow's pantaloons when the color suited them."
The threat was serious. For many,
the destruction of crops meant economic ruin, if not starvation.
To face up to the scourge the settlers of Utah utilized or at
least tried many strategies, not just one. Here are some of the
counter-measures they considered:
- Eat the insects. This was what
the Indians did. Nebraskan Charles Riley was one who thought
the white settlers could do the same thing. He even tried different
recipes. "A broth can be made which tastes like beef broth,"
he wrote. "When fried or roasted in their own oil they
have a nutty flavor. Also boiled and then served with a few
vegetables and a little butter, pepper, salt, and vinegar, makes
an excellent fricassee." There is no evidence that this
suggestion caught on in Utah or anywhere else. The cultural
aversion to such a diet was too strong.
- Plant extra crops. It was Brigham
Young who put forth the idea that the poor insects required
nourishment. Why not, then, plant additional fields grain that
would feed them. "I put in considerable of a crop on purpose
for them to eat," he wrote in 1867, "hoping that my
regular crops might be spared. The crop I put in for them suffered
but slightly." Every time I think of this suggestion, I
chuckle. Did he envision signs saying "Grasshoppers! Your
field is over there. Stay out of this one" or "Welcome,
grasshoppers, this is for you with our compliments"? But
perhaps he was simply thinking in large terms of what the hatching
insects would consume. Planting more, he thought, would leave
more after the hoppers had done their damage.
- Bring in other birds to feed on
the insects. Pigeons were reported to be good destroyers of
grasshoppers in Payson. Meadowlarks and hawks were also praised
for consuming large numbers of grasshoppers. In Smithfield,
chickens were pronounced "very useful in destroying grasshoppers
in gardens." In Ephraim someone figured out how to put
hen houses on wheels and move them across fields. But the idea
proved impractical on a large scale.
- Find alternative sources of food
when insects destroyed the grain. The most successful such enterprise,
launched in 1855 and 1856, was catching and netting fish in
large quantities, especially in Utah Lake. When there is not
much on the table, one can well imagine that a trout, or even
a sucker, was welcome fare. Apostle John Henry Smith thought
these fish deserved as much praise as the gulls.
- Send in the U.S. Army. This proposal
came in 1875 from the state entomologist of Missouri. After
discussing various techniques, he said the surest way to defeat
the insects was to attack them in their home in the Rocky Mountains,
"employing the soldiery if necessary." The Deseret
News pronounced this "a capital idea ... Think of
the soldier boys out on the benches, chasing the locust, and
following the grasshopper!"
- Use mechanical devices to destroy
the invaders. Shovels and brooms are simple mechanical devices,
of course, but it didn't take long before inventors were coming
up with machinery that could destroy insects in large quantities.
In 1871, for example, A.W. Winberg, a Salt Lake City blacksmith,
demonstrated a horse-drawn machine that scraped up the insects
and moved them through a pair of rollers that were "apt
to completely demoralize the 'iron clads.'" An ambitious
government report published in 1878 included a lengthy chapter
entitled "Remedies and Devices for Destruction."
- Bounties. In Nebraska someone
hit upon the idea of paying a bounty for dead grasshoppers.
No doubt it was thought cheaper to pay for their destruction
in this way than suffer the loss of crops. Unfortunately, according
to the Omaha Bee, this program brought out the worst
in human nature. It had "a most pernicious and demoralizing
effect upon the community, leading to a wholesale course of
lying, cheating, and everything mean and low, by which the county
could be swindled." In Utah bounties were still being employed
at the end of the century.
- Pray. This, of course, was the
recourse in 1849. As we tell the story, the pioneers fell to
their knees and pled to the Lord to help them. The gulls then
appeared like a white cloud, a true deliverance from the west.
It requires little reflection to realize that others threatened
by the invading insect hordes also prayed. For example, Missouri
in 1875 and Minnesota in 1877 set aside a day of fasting and
prayer. And miraculous deliverance was not always forthcoming.
Yet the Saints were grateful for whatever instrumentality appeared
that lessened their suffering. In the fall of 1855, according
to John Wakeham, a strong east wind arose and blew hordes of
locusts into the Great Salt Lake. He considered the wind an
answer to prayer.
But at no point, to my knowledge,
were the Saints inclined simply to pray and then sit on their
hands while waiting for the Lord to solve the problem. "Faith
without works is dead," said James.
Oliver Cowdery thought he could translate
the ancient plates without effort but discovered (D&C 9) he
had first to do his best and then pray for confirmation. Even
in the nineteenth century the people were urged to have a reserve
supply of food to help tide them over in case of emergency. Said
Brigham Young in 1868: "I would rather the people would exercise
a little more sense and save means to provide for themselves,
instead of squandering it away and asking the Lord to feed them."
Works combined with faith and prayer
— this was the pattern. The Lord would not desert them,
but the Latter-day Saints should do all in their power to help
themselves.
Click
here to sign up for Meridian's FREE email updates.
© 2007 Meridian
Magazine. All Rights Reserved.
|