Germs of Warfare
Chapter 12 of The Anatomy of Peace
By The Arbinger Institute
Editor’s note: The Anatomy
of Peace, an important new book by the writers of Leadership
and Self-Deception, shows us the cause of human conflict so
that we can learn to live in peace. Look for the continuation
next Monday.
“Justification has some telltale
signs,” Yusuf began. “I’ve already mentioned a few — how we begin
horribilizing others, for example. In fact, that sign is a subset
of a whole category of signs that you might think of as exaggerations.
"When our hearts are at war,
we tend to exaggerate others’ faults; that’s what we call horribilizing.
We also tend to exaggerate the differences between ourselves and
those we are blaming. We see little in common with them, when
the reality is that we are similar in many if not most respects.
We also exaggerate the importance of anything that will justify
us.
"If I had had an appointment
around the time Mordechai spilled his coins, for example, it would
have suddenly seemed critical that I get to it. If I had happened
to be carrying a book with me, I might have suddenly felt the
need to bury my nose in it and start reading. Whenever we need
to be justified, anything that will give us justification will
immediately take on exaggerated importance in our life. Self-betrayal
corrupts everything — even the value we place on things.
“And consider,” he continued, “when
in the Mordechai story did I start to devote my energy to blaming
others? Before I betrayed myself or after?”
The group looked at the board. “After,”
Pettis answered first.
“And when in the story did I start
feeling like a victim?”
“After you betrayed yourself,” Ria
said.
“And when in the story did I become
consumed with the question of who’s right and who’s wrong? After
I betrayed myself or before?”
“After.”
“Are you noticing a pattern?” Yusuf
asked. “I betrayed myself, and my whole world changed. It changed
because I had chosen a different way of being in the world — a
way that needed justification. Because I needed justification,
I began to see everything in a self-justifying way. Others, myself,
the world, my past, my present, my future, my hardships, my responsibilities
— my view of everything became transformed — transformed for the
purpose of feeling justified.
“As we betray ourselves over time,
we develop characteristic styles of self-justification. One person,
for example, might find justification in seeing himself as being
better than others. If I think I am superior, I can excuse a lot
of sins. Another might find justification in feeling he is entitled
to things he isn’t getting. After all, if others aren’t giving
me what they should, it isn’t my fault if I blame them or treat
them poorly. And so on.
“There are countless ways to feel
justified, but I would like to introduce four common styles of
justification. These are justification styles that all of us carry
to one degree or another, but we might find that some of them
are bigger for us than others. My hope is that pointing out these
styles will help us to see ourselves a little more clearly and
to discover some ways in which our own hearts are warring.
“The first of these is a style you’ll
immediately recognize from the Mordechai story. It’s what we call
the better-than style of justification, which is illustrated by
the better-than box. This style of justification does not allow
us to see others as people because we must see them prejudicially,
as less than we are — less skilled perhaps, or less important,
less knowledgeable, less righteous, and so on; but always less,
and therefore always objects.”
At that, Yusuf drew the following:
“I have a question,” Pettis said,
as Yusuf completed the quadrants of the box.
“Sure, go ahead.”
“What if someone really is
less talented at something, for example, and that I really am
better in that area? Are you suggesting it’s a self-justification
simply to note that?”
“Not necessarily,” Yusuf responded.
“I can notice people’s relative strengths and weaknesses when
I’m seeing them as people. What’s different when I’m in this box,
however, is that I feel superior to or better than others
because of these strengths or weaknesses. I use them to keep score
of my and others’ relative worth. So when I’m in this box, I’m
doing more than simply noticing differences; I’m making judgments
about peoples’ worth based on those differences.
“Let me illustrate with a story.
A few years ago, my wife, Lina, and I went out to a rather nice
Mexican restaurant to celebrate Valentines Day. When the attendant
seated us, I immediately caught a whiff of the most repugnant
smell of body odor imaginable. And it was coming from the next
table! As I looked in that direction, I noticed the unkempt, slovenly
person who was obviously the source. I was repulsed. How dare
he come out in public this way! I raged within. And on
Valentines Day of all days! He’s going to ruin our evening!
In no time, this guy was an inconsiderate, filthy scumbag in my
book.”
“What a considerate man you were
as well,” Elizabeth murmured, a sly smile stealing across her
face.
“I was just noticing another’s deficiencies,”
Yusuf deadpanned.
“Quite,” Elizabeth said, with knowing
in her voice.
“Speaking of deficiencies,” Yusuf
continued, “Lina didn’t seem too bothered by the smell. I’m not
sure what bothered me more — the smell, or Lina not being bothered
by it. I began badgering her and complaining so much that Lina
finally asked the waiter to seat us elsewhere. Thankfully, from
our new location in the next section of the restaurant I could
only faintly smell the man’s stench.
“When our food came, however, the
body odor stench came with it! Did the waiter stink too? I
wondered. He looked clean enough, so I looked around to see if
the smelly man had just walked near us. But he was still seated
across the way at his table. Then I noticed that the stench was
coming from my plate of food! It turns out that this restaurant’s
black beans had a peculiar smell to them — a smell I had mistaken
as body odor.”
“Who would have thought — scumbag
beans,” Elizabeth joked.
“Right,” Yusuf laughed.
“That’s a nice story, turning out
as it did,” Gwyn said. “But what if the man really did stink?
What if you weren’t mistaken?”
“That’s exactly the question I want
to ask as well, Gwyn,” Yusuf agreed. “What about that?” he asked
the group. “What if I was right?”
“I have a thought about that,” Elizabeth
spoke up, “as I’ve been in this kind of box ever since we began
this morning.”
“Really,” Yusuf said. “How so?”
“I have been upset at my sister for
not making the effort to be here for her boy. Someone had to come,
so I came for her. That’s a dangerous combination of facts for
someone who is prone to feeling superior, isn’t it?” she said,
blowing her hair out of her eyes in mock exasperation. “I’ve been
sitting here thinking about this while you’ve been talking, and
here’s what’s occurred to me: I still think she should have made
the effort to come. I think I am right about that. But I haven’t
been able to stop at simply noticing the problem. I’ve come to
obsess over it. I’m wallowing in unproductive thoughts and feelings
as much as you, Yusuf, were wallowing in smelly vapors.”
“Yes,” Yusuf chuckled. “You’re suggesting
that even if I am right about something, my emotional experience
will be entirely different in the box than it would be if I were
out.”
“Well, yes, I'm wondering,” she said.
“Just like you’ve written there in the feelings area of the box,
I’ve been impatient about being here, and I’m filled with disdain
for my sister and her husband for not earning more, not making
this the financial priority they should. I'm filled with how they
are a problem family, how my sister has always made poor
choices in my eyes, how they fail their children, and so on.”
Elizabeth paused, her mind many miles
away with her family. “I think I have made myself into an insufferable
know-it-all,” she muttered, while looking vacantly across the
room.
“If so,” Yusuf said, “you’ll have
that in common with a lot of us. I certainly justified myself
in this way toward Mordechai, for example, didn’t I?”
Most in the room nodded, but Elizabeth
was still lost in thought.
“Let’s consider a second common style
of justification, shall we?” he said, as he walked to the board.
“It’s a style we call the I-deserve box.”
“By the way,” he added, as he began
to write, “people who go around feeling better-than generally
feel entitled to a lot of things, so these two styles of justification
often come together.”
As he finished writing, he said, “When I’m in
this kind of box, I typically feel mistreated, victimized, entitled,
deprived, resentful, and so on. Did I have any of these thoughts
and feelings in the Mordechai story?”
“Yes,” the group answered.
“I believe you’re right,” Yusuf agreed. “If I
had been alive to how such thoughts and feelings are designed
to give me justification, I might have been able to recognize
that something was crooked in how I was being. I might have been
able to find my way back to seeing Mordechai merely as he was,
as a person.
“But I didn’t recognize my crookedness, of course,
and I went on viewing Mordechai more or less as an object for
many years. And most of the other Mordechais I met as well,” he
added. “Which is to say that I was feeling justified in both the
better-than and I-deserve ways in the Mordechai story, and probably
in the black beans story too. When I’m seeing others crookedly,
what I need in that moment is justification, and I’ll find it
any way I can get it — whether by seeing myself as better, as
entitled, both, and so on.
“Before we leave the black beans story,” Yusuf
continued, “I want to address two additional points. First of
all, notice how my better-than and I-deserve boxes set me up to
be mistaken about this man. When would I be more likely to mistake
the source of the offensive odor — when I look disdainfully and
resentfully at others or when I simply see people?”
“When you look disdainfully and resentfully at
them, no question,” Pettis answered.
“So notice,” Yusuf continued, “the more sure I
am that I’m right, the more likely I will actually be mistaken.
My need to be right makes it more likely that I will be wrong!
Likewise, the more sure I am that I am mistreated, the more likely
I am to miss ways that I am mistreating others myself. My need
for justification obscures the truth.”
“Interesting,” Pettis said, while turning the
ideas over in his mind. The others appeared to be working hard
on them as well.
“Yes,” Yusuf agreed. “One more point about the
story before we move on. In order to make it, I’m going to change
the scenario slightly. Let’s say this story happened at home or
in the workplace. Let’s also assume, as Gwyn raised earlier, that
this person really did have a body odor problem. In that case,
which version of me — the better-than, the I-deserve, or the seeing
person version — do you suppose would be more likely to be able
to help him overcome his problem?”
“Oh, I’d imagine that the seeing person version
would be more helpful,” Pettis answered.
“Why?”
“Well,” Pettis hesitated, “if you went to him
when you were thinking he was a filthy lowlife or when you felt
he owed you something, you’d probably invite him to resist you.”
“Does everyone agree with that?” Yusuf asked.
“I’m not sure that I do,” Lou said. “I’m worried
that if you just saw him as a person, you might not talk to him
at all. You might just let it slide.”
Yusuf smiled. “You’re still worried that seeing
others as people means you have to be soft, aren’t you, Lou?”
“Maybe I am, maybe I’m not,” Lou smiled coyly.
“It just seems like you might let this kind of thing slide rather
than hurt someone’s feelings. That’s all I’m saying.”
“Would I be likely to just let it slide if I really
cared about the man?” Yusuf responded. “Would I just let him stink
and therefore let everyone think poorly of him? Is that what someone
who really cares about another is likely to do?”
“Well, no, I suppose not,” Lou allowed.
“In fact,” Yusuf continued, “when I let people
go on hurting themselves and others without making the effort
to help them to change, it is rarely because I am seeing them
as a person. Usually it’s because I am being motivated by yet
another kind of self-justification, a justification that very
often causes people to go soft and to feel justified by their
softness.”
“That is something I would be interested in hearing
about,” Lou said.
“I thought you might,” Yusuf smiled.
Copyright © 2006 by The Arbinger
Institute
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including
photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods,
without the prior written permission of the publisher, except
in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and
certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For
permission requests, write to the publisher, addressed "Attention:
Permissions Coordinator," at this address: www.bkconnection.com.