Click here to find out more
 

Click Here to Shop  -- Meridian Marketplace

LDSGetaway.com
LDSPro.com




Click here to find out more






Share the article on this page with a friend.
Click here.
Meridian Magazine : : Home

 

Bonds that Make Us Free, Part 33: "My Beginning Will Not Dictate My End"
by C. Terry Warner

We have learned that if a primary collusion does not keep us from undergoing a change of heart, it is likely to lurk in the background after we have experienced the beginnings of such a change. It will wait there, ready to cause trouble. And sooner or later it will show itself unexpectedly in the form of some impulse, aversion, stubborn preference, fear, irritability, despondency, impatience, outbursts of anger, or similar behavior. When this happens, we lose the considerate feelings we had recently been enjoying, as Richard and Victoria both did when they reverted to their old ways. Then we either revive an old collusion or create a new one.

Such slippages should serve as signals that there's more work to do if we are going to obtain and sustain a change of heart. That work consists of tracing our "long-running" emotional and attitudinal habits to their source and rooting them out; this is sometimes called "unfinished business." Unless we get ourselves engaged in and ultimately succeed at this business, we shall never fully resolve the satellite collusions that afflict us, for we shall never be rid of our collusion hooks.

Every growing season on my property I battle a noxious garden weed called morning glory. It twines itself around anything in the vicinity and ruins desirable plants. You can pull as much of it as you possibly can out of the soil and still stupendously long pieces of root remain underground, sometimes miles long. These roots quickly push their way through the surface again. You can kill this weed, but only with a powerful herbicide that travels all the way to the ends of the roots. The absolute honesty of soul we have been discussing in this book can kill the perversity of an I-It way of being, but only if it penetrates to the deepest of its roots.

Transforming "The Way I Am"
We are now prepared to see how this works in ending a primary collusion. Recall the story of Mandy, the woman who felt constantly rejected because, as she remembered only too often, her father had spent his free time before his death with her older brother, Jeddy, or little sister, Nessie, but seldom with her. (You might want to look at this story again in Part 1).

Not long before, something extraordinary happened. It unfolded one evening when my husband had told me he would be home early, so we could have dinner together. For some time a resentment had been building up in me, especially over his preoccupation with work and with fixing up the yard. We didn't talk very much, at least in the way I wanted to talk. I had worked up my courage. I thought if I told him of my need he might understand and sympathize and we could spend the evening just talking about the things that mattered to us. I prepared a meal he liked and he thanked me for it, but then said he needed to get to the nursery for some bedding plants and potting soil before it closed.

This struck me like an ultimate blow. I had prepared myself to go out on a limb and almost beg for his kindness—and he had better things to do!

I went to the bedroom and started to cry. But suddenly there came to me memories of myself as a girl with deeply hurt feelings, holding back tears. I remembered one episode after another of Daddy being too busy or telling me I couldn't go with him or saying I was too old for hugs and kisses. Right then I realized I was doing the same thing with my husband as I had done with Daddy, only now I was supposed to be grown up.

Then there came memories of more episodes of feeling hurt by people who wouldn't pay attention to me and thinking how cruel they were and not wanting to be anywhere near them. It seemed as I reflected on it that I've always been the hurt one, and always suspected people of wanting to close me out. If they wouldn't gush over me, I took that as rejection. One after another, I recalled these events and could see the truth, glowing and terrible, in front of me. I had always rejected others so they could not reject me! I felt so sorry. I felt I loved them all and wanted to find a way to make it up to them.

But I couldn't make it up to my father. He was gone. I wanted to apologize to him and ask for his forgiveness. Daddy, I wanted to say, I didn't know I was hurting you.

I went walking out in my husband's garden. It was so well cared for. Unbelievable as it sounds, this was the first time it occurred to me that he kept that garden nice for me!

And then a whole lot of memories came of Daddy and me together. He would have me help him with the lawn and the flowerbeds. On Saturday morning he often came to my volleyball games. It shamed and thrilled me to remember these things. I must have held his hand quite a lot, because I could remember very clearly how rough and hard it was and how he smelled when he got home from work—I knew that because I'd stand next to him in the bathroom while he washed his hands and fingernails and arms and face and neck before we had dinner. He would let me dry his mustache. I would make the bristles go upward and he would pretend it hurt him and we would laugh. And then I could remember we'd dry dishes together after dinner and he would ask me all about school and my friends. Our vacations came back to me, too, when Daddy would relax and we would play games and go to the country store for a treat. How could I have forgotten all these good things?

So focused are accusing feelings that they obliterate or shunt into irrelevance all other facts except those that support them. If, before her change of heart, someone had reminded Mandy of her father's kindness and frequent companionship, she would have said that she didn't remember it or that it wasn't much or that it couldn't make up for his neglect. But with that change came a revival of her memory of what he had given her, and she found it fully sufficient for her happiness.

What happened here? The past is the past, after all. The damage Mandy had sustained was done. How could that damage be undone?

Though none of us is responsible for the misfortunes that befall us, we are, thankfully, responsible for how we use those misfortunes. We cannot alter past events, it's true. Not having been responsible for them, we cannot take responsibility for them. But we are responsible for the effect they have upon us—for the meaning we assign to them and the way we remember them. And we can learn and grow from them.

This important truth is expressed in the subtitle of a book written by Wayne Muller, who has worked extensively with people abused as children. It reads: "The Spiritual Advantages of a Painful Childhood." Whether past pain blesses or crushes us is ours to decide. In working with abused women, I, like others, have taught them that the first step toward wholeness is to let go of all resentment and recrimination. When they no longer carry themselves in the world as victims, they can start on the road to recovery, but not until then. The fact that Mandy had many good memories to recover when she "came to herself" is inspiring but not essential. Even those who have few or none can make it.

Beginning at age six, Jacqueline had been abused sexually by several men during her childhood in the Detroit ghetto where she was born to a nineteen- year-old prostitute. After an uncle rescued her from that situation when she was a teenager, she worked hard to make something of her life. When I met her, she occupied a trusted, influential position in one of America's forty largest corporations. It was not hard to understand why—she was bright and incisive and had built a reputation for getting difficult things done. Besides that, everyone, including Susan and me, found her warm and welcoming, and she was so instinctively, artlessly therapeutic that at noon and after work people would wait outside her office for a chance to talk with her about their troubles. No anger or self-pity hobbled or confused this woman; she had vacated her horrendous past, taking with her its lessons without its liabilities.

Six months or so before we met, Jacqueline initiated a court proceeding against her former husband; long, long before that she had discovered that he had violated their two daughters from their childhood. In the first weeks of our association—she worked with the Arbinger Institute for a time—she allowed herself to acknowledge the abusive background from which he had come, and to see him forgivingly. With her daughters, she left all of her resentment, though not all of her sorrow, behind. On occasion she would tell her very moving and inspiring story publicly, always in the third person, as if she were talking about someone else. Then, at the end, she would add two sentences. The first: "That little girl whose story I have told you is me." And the second: "The mission statement for my life is 'My beginning will not dictate my end.'"

Killing the Root
Mandy's and Jacqueline's stories illustrate vividly the principle that we determine whether our past crushes or blesses us. So does the following story of a man named Samuel.

Since puberty Samuel had exhibited symptoms that would have led many therapists to assume childhood abuse even before talking to him about his history. Much of the time he was sunk in deep depression, a kind of utter darkness of spirit that would completely incapacitate him. He had been put up for adoption by his natural parents, and his adoptive parents were highly dysfunctional individuals who apparently could not relax their concern with their own personal agendas enough to nurture or to love him. Like many other victims, this was a child whose shocking introduction to this life was cold, systematic rejection and mistreatment.

So harsh was Samuel's self-loathing that he became involved in what he himself considered despicable sexual activities. Professionals labeled him an addict. He spent a great deal of time with psychiatrists who for a period of years medicated him heavily, with very limited success. One day he appeared at my door and asked me to help him. We talked about the ideas I have been presenting in this book, and then I suggested he talk also with certain others. The following week he recounted to me a significant event.

That very morning, he had been pondering a recurrent dream in which he found himself in an abandoned house—the furniture was gone; the windows were boarded up. The waning light of sunset filtered through the windows. He became aware of beings moving outside the house; they were vampires, scratching to gain entrance. As he continued in this reverie, he found himself reliving the dream, even though now awake. He realized this was the house of his grandparents. In the scene he was reliving, he went out on the veranda where he encountered his adoptive father, in his early thirties, smiling.

The two men walked together onto the lawn and sat down to talk. Samuel felt a desperate yearning for his father to provide something of the care and love and emotional sustenance of which Samuel felt he had been deprived. As they sat there, his father put his head on Samuel's shoulder and then, gradually, began to diminish in size, becoming smaller and more vulnerable than the adopted son sitting by his side. All of a sudden Samuel realized that his father was the one who needed to be loved. For the first time ever, he felt compassion for this man.

After this experience, Samuel spent the hours before he came to see me that day walking in the mountains, weeping profusely, in a release, both painful and joyous, of pent-up feelings for which he did not even have a name. "I anticipated that I would one day need to go through some sort of process of excusing my father for how he treated me," Samuel said. "But that is not at all what happened. Instead I came to the realization that he needed me even more than I needed him, and I had closed my heart toward him."

Samuel said that in a deep way that he could never before put into words he had always known this. Now he admitted it freely. "What left me at that moment was my conviction that my parents were to blame for my condition. Yes, in one sense they had misused me, but they could not have done better than they did. I remembered with great sorrow something I had once been told, that my father stuttered as he was growing up and that his father took him to the basement and beat him to get him to stop. Why had I not remembered this before now?"

This reminds us of Mandy's recovered memories when all accusation left her heart. Samuel allowed his father to be as he really was, a man deprived and mistreated. Previously he had refused to allow him this, and the way he refused was to insist on being the deprived and mistreated one himself. This shows clearly that his resentment of his father lay behind his depression; the depression was the way he carried on the resentment, just as Mandy's quickness to feel rejection and school failures were her way of doing the same sort of thing. Samuel said he realized that the depression "allowed me to excuse myself for closing myself to my father and his needs." It was in allowing the father he had so much resented to become real for him that he was healed. I call this receiving the gift of his father's humanity.

That day marked the turning point in Samuel's existence. Previously, with great determination he had achieved some control over his sexual behavior. But beginning with the day I have described, his depression began to lighten and his addictive cravings gradually disappeared.

Mandy's and Samuel's stories illustrate with a shimmering clarity the organic connection between primary collusions and the satellite collusions connected with them. Healing a primary collusion helps to cut many satellite collusions at their source. We kill the root of a present anguished emotional condition and then—but only then—it dies.

This doesn't imply, by the way, that the only way to end a satellite collusion is to heal the primary collusion from which it springs. Progress on a satellite, though incomplete, can soften us enough that we can at last work on the primary collusion successfully.

"Most people think emotional injuries are like physical injuries and not our responsibility at all...." In Part 34, we'll look at how taking responsibility for our emotional difficulties is a necessary step toward resolving them....

 

Click here to sign up for Meridian's FREE email updates.


© 2002Meridian Magazine.  All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

 

To find out more about
how to order this book, click the image below.

Bonds That Make Us Free
by C. Terry Warner

About the Author:


Dr. Terry Warner

Dr. C. Terry Warner holds a Ph.D. from Yale University and is a professor of philosophy at Brigham Young University. He has been a visiting senior member of Linacre College, Oxford University, and in 1979 founded The Arbinger Institute, a widely respected group that devotes itself to helping organizations, families, and individuals. He and his wife, Susan, have ten children.

What do you think?
Share your thoughts, comments, and impressions about this article.
Related Articles:

Books Archive

Bonds that Make Us Free: Healing Our Relationships, Coming to Ourselves
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7
Part 8
Part 9
Part 10
Part 11
Part 12
Part 13
Part 14
Part 15
Part 16
Part 17
Part 18
Part 19
Part 20
Part 21
Part 22
Part 23
Part 24
Part 25
Part 26
Part 27
Part 28
Part 29
Part 30
Part 31
Part 32

Format for Print
Click Here