|
Share the article on
this page with a friend.
Click
here.
|
|
|

Bonds
that Make Us Free Part 24: The Truth Dispels the Lie
by
C. Terry Warner
"Might
I Be in the Wrong?"
Calling
a change of heart "a healing" captures something important
about it. Like the body's healing, it's not something we make
happen. And it's not something that happens to us, either.
We might describe it best with terms like recovery and
return and coming to ourselves. Healing comes
about naturally, when the causes of disease have been removed.
It is a self-mending or recuperation that brings a natural return
of our being to its proper condition.
This means
the healing of the soul cannot be forced. We can try very hard
for a very long time to think better of an enemy and yet fail.
But does
it follow that we can't do something to put ourselves in a better
position for it to happen? No, it doesn't. There's much we can
do. For example, in Part
21 I reported on a "reconsideration exercise"
in which we make ourselves available to be affected by others
and do so by thinking about them from an imagined I-You point
of view. Effort and willpower cannot by themselves cause our
heart to change, but that doesn't mean that we can't put ourselves
in an optimal position for that change to happen.
A responsible
step in loosening the grip of any lie we might be living is
to ask ourselves, solemnly and seriously, this momentous question:
"Might I be in the wrong?"
What gives
this question its power? The answer can be stated very simply:
Just to ask the question seriously, even without answering it,
is already to undergo a change of attitude. A feeling of humility
comes over us. Our focus shifts from the faults of others to
the difficulties they may be suffering because of us. Our certainty
of their guilt and our innocence is shaken.
To admit
our errors or weaknesses in this fashion can bring us liberation
and strength. It will seem ironic to say this, for facing up
to the truth is usually what we most fear to do. Nevertheless,
it's true. There is much transforming power in frankly acknowledging
the truth about our own wrongdoing.
One of my
associates, whom I'll call Alan, shared this story:
Not long
ago I was given a wallet for Father's Day. It was not the
sort of wallet I would have wanted. My wife, Shirley, picked
it out for me. I understand now to what lengths she went to
find just the right wallet, but when I opened the box and
looked into it, all I saw was a not-what-I-would-have- wanted
wallet. Nevertheless, I was too considerate to hurt Shirley's
feelings, or at least this is what I was thinking about myself
at the time. So I said, "Oh, thank you. I like this wallet
very much."
She was
looking right at me and she said right away, "You don't
like it."
"Oh,
yes I do. Why, look at the nice white stitching on the edge.
And all the plastic windows where I can put my credit cards."
"You
don't like it. I can tell."
The
situation was embarrassing me. My cheeks were getting red. I
shoved the wallet in the box in the manner of a man whose gratitude
has been rudely rejected.
Alan resented
being given the wallet; to him it felt as though Shirley was
setting him up for humiliation in front of his friends. He did
not express this resentment childishly. Instead he did the "right
thing"or, to speak more accurately, counterfeited
the right thingby acting politely and thanking her. But
she could tell that his heart wasn't in it. As we discovered
in Part 15 there's all
the difference in the world between genuinely treasuring a gift
and trying to show that you're treasuring it. So he responded
to getting caught by taking offense and angrily shoving the
wallet back in the box.
His story
continues:
Shirley
went into the kitchen. I began to think about what had happened.
It came to me that in a certain very subtle way I had been
putting on airs. I had been concerned about what my associates
would think when I pulled such a wallet out of my pocket.
I realized I had refused to see the wallet for what it really
wasan expression of her care for me and a manifestation
of considerable effort on her part.
Whereas
I had been embarrassed and irritated before, I now felt sorry.
What sorrowed me was not exactly the particular words I had
said. Given what I was feeling about the whole affair, it
was about the best thing I could say. I was sorry because
of having those feelings. I realized I had actually been thinking
that my wife was forcing something upon me that would embarrass
me in front of my friends. And now it seemed incredible to
me that I could have resented an act of genuine kindness.
I
felt I ought to tell her forthrightly what I was feeling, and
I did. By her look I could tell she forgave me without any reservation.
When Alan
looked honestly at himself, he saw a man different from the
considerate and grateful person he had been trying to present
to Shirley. He saw a man annoyed and resentful and therefore
far from considerate and grateful. The way he had been acting
was not the truth. Contrary to what he wanted to believe, he
had not been victimized by this woman who had worked hard to
please him. He had victimized her.
The Astounding
Act of Yielding to the Truth
We can spell out the things that happened within Alan when
he truthfully admitted the wrong he had done. Listed below are
some of them. Keep in mind as you read that they happened not
in sequence, but all at once. In fact, it's most helpful to
look upon them as just one event. The various points that follow
are different aspects of that event.
First,
Alan saw his fault.
Second,
that meant he no longer thought of Shirley as the problem.
Third,
his resentment of her evaporated. His accusing, victimized feelings
were gone.
Fourth,
he no longer felt helpless to deal with the problem he thought
Shirley was causing him, because he no longer thought there
was such a problem! What he had supposed to be the issueher
failure to appreciate and respect his tastewasn't the
real issue after all, only the apparent one. The real issue
was his absorption in himself, which is the inevitable product
of self-betrayal.
Fifth,
he was able to see Shirley truthfully and to appreciate her
feelings and needs. And when that happened, he told me, he felt
flooded with feeling for her. "Suddenly," he said,
"she took on the look of a woman who is loved." When
he acknowledged the truth to himself, stopped nursing his identity
as the Wounded-but-Valiant One, and let go of finding fault
with his wife, she changed. His image of her untwisted itself.
He saw her as she really wasand loved her.
Sixth,
the opportunity to do the right thing reappeared in the world,
whereas it had not been there before. At that moment, the right
thing was to confess forthrightly to her what he had done. If
he had tried to do this without first undergoing a change of
heart, he would have done it for the wrong reason; his confession
would have been counterfeit.
Seventh,
he found himself at last able to influence her positively. She
sensed his truthfulness and his sorrow and frankly forgave him.
In this
list we can see the seven aspects of a change of heart that
results from yielding to the truth.
Truth
and Compassion
All of the elements listed above occur in the following
story. I met the author, Cynthia, in one of my classes.
My husband,
Shawn, and I are both writers. We have a baby. Shawn insists
that I keep the house clean, prepare the meals, stay well-dressed
and appealing, and, most of all, keep the baby absolutely
quiet during his writing hours. I write during the baby's
afternoon nap if I can, but usually late at night and early
in the morning.
If there
is any noise from the baby, Shawn is not patient. He bitingly
asks whether I understand the importance of what he is writing
for his career and our future. Until recently tears would
well up in my eyes in response to this harshness. Sometimes
I would protest that he had no right to speak rudely to me.
A quarrel would ensue. But more often I would suffer this
sharpness silently and bitterly. I could not understand why
I had to suffer when I had done nothing wrong.
One
morning I left the bedroom door ajar and the baby toddled out.
She was scattering some of Shawn's pages when he saw her. He
began to yell at me. I could feel the spray in my face. I began
to burn with resentment and to search my mind for some way to
respond in kind. But all of a sudden I thought, "It's a
lie. What I am doing right now is a lie." I was doing the
same thing I was imputing to him! My rage just melted. I was
filled with compassion toward Shawn for the first time in a
long time. In fact, all I could think of in that moment was
how I could help my husband.
As part
of her self-betrayer's lie, Cynthia perceived Shawn as a person
hurting her feelings. Then, when the truthful self-confession
came"What I am doing right now is a lie"she
no longer believed that. She could see that her resentment and
pain, which had come to an end, had been her doing. She
now understood that he had not been hurting her at all. The
only person to whom he was doing damage was himself. She saw
a man making himself miserable, as part of an effort to feel
justified in his anger toward his wife. He had been hurting
himself, not her.
With the
recognition of that truth came compassion and concern, which
is what we would expect in a person who sees another person
hurting himself. Cynthia's heart went out to Shawn. The same
thing happens to any of us who acknowledge the truth as straightforwardly
as she did. The emotion we experience in the presence of
the truth is love.
We can give
whatever name we want to Alan's faultblaming Shirley when
he was the one doing wrong, putting her on the defensive, thinking
only of himself. Whatever we call it, the very instant that
he acknowledged this fault, it no longer existed! Amazing! By
seeing and freely admitting our fault, we are rid of it!
We have only to confess to ourselves the truth about the wrong
we have done and, by that very confession, we cease to do it.
Why? Because when we are in self-betrayal, we are living a lie,
and a lie cannot coexist with a full and free acknowledgment
of the truth.
What we
have just described is a man's change of heart toward his wife.
Though not a full change in his way of beingthat takes
time, experience, and faithfulnessit can rightfully be
called a good beginning. At that time, in that situation, Alan
started to become a different man.
Counterfeit
Honesty
Some people think they can admit to doing wrong and still
keep doing it. But an admission that doesn't bring with it a
softening of heart is a dishonest admission. What such people
call "telling the truth" is a sort of intellectual
game in which they rehearse to themselves some of the facts
about what is happening while still hanging on to accusing,
self-excusing emotions. Remember from Part
5 that a self-betrayer can be right about the facts of a
situation without letting go of the accusing emotion, which
is the biggest lie of all. Genuine admission of the truth must
be done emotionally as well as mentally, for we can lie while
sticking strictly to the facts because the facts can't cause
us to do wrong or take offense. Honesty through and through
requires giving up the accusing feelings that go with our accusing
thoughts.
You can
test this for yourself. Recall the feelings you had on some
occasion when you "told yourself the truth" intellectually
but not emotionally. (For instance, suppose someone pointed
out that you treated a certain person unfairly and you responded,
"Yeah, yeah, I know I'm wrong"without allowing
yourself to feel the least bit bad about it.) Compare whatever
feelings you would have had on such an occasion with feelings
when you confessed the truth with your whole being. You will
find the difference striking. In the former case, none of the
seven aspects of a change of heart came about. In the latter,
they all occurred. Together with your sorrow, you felt relieved
and even joyful because at last the lie had been put behind
you.
We must
take great care that we don't block our exit from the box by
counterfeiting an admission of the truth.
Fear
of What Will Save Us
When we are stuck in accusing thoughts and feelings, we
are usually reluctant to face the truth because we fear that
it will condemn us. The truth frankly acknowledged will turn
out to be heaven, but in prospect it looks more like hell. In
this you will recognize the mirror image of what we learned
from C. S. Lewis's allegory, which is that we cling to the tormented
condition of vengeance, spite, and criticism that deserves to
be called hellthinking that our vindictive attitude somehow
points the way to a solution of our problems.
We learned
in the preceding section that when we confess that we have been
wrongnot just on an isolated point of argument but in
the way we have lived our liveswe no longer feel a need
to blame others and to defend ourselves against them. We become
free of the accusing, anguished thoughts and feelings with which
we have afflicted ourselves, free to let ourselves be touched
by others' concerns and aspirations and joys, and free to stop
worrying about protecting or polishing our self-image.
So it is
blame that we must let go of. Blame is the lie by which we
convince ourselves that we are victims. It is the lie that robs
us of our serenity, our generosity, our confidence, and our
delight in life.
A woman
I will call Virginia shared this account:
A few
months ago I was at dinner with my husband and three other
couples. About the time dessert arrived, my husband turned
and rebuked me for interrupting him. I reacted as if struck
in the face, growing pale and rigid with shock and shame.
Our dinner friends to a person witnessed the same thing: My
husband had been an aggressive jerk, and I had been victimized
by him. One friend was so upset by the incident that, when
he saw me a few days later, he said he hoped I would seriously
consider leaving my husband.
My friend's
reaction was even more disturbing than the incident itself.
His words reflected back to me a portrait of a helpless woman
abused by her man. I struggled for days with this awful picture.
Then, without warning, something strange happened. In a moment
of epiphany, the perception I had of myself as victim shattered
like a curtain of glass. With absolute clarity I saw that
my "victimization" wasn't the result of something
done to me, that instead it was willfully self-created. I
even remembered the crossroad of choice on the night of the
dinner: My husband made his remark, and I first felt wrongly
accused and furious. Then I thought, just at the periphery
of my consciousness: "You say I hurt you?!
Well, honey, watch this! " And I launched into
my act.
The
scariest part of all was how skillful I had become at creating
this image in the eyes of observers. If you had been there,
you probably would have agreed that my husband was the beast
and I was the innocent party. And, what is even trickier, until
I saw this "victim form," I couldn't have stopped
myself for love or money, because I "knew" that it
was real, that I was right, that I was being mistreated.
The revelation
stunned me. It had never occurred to me to see myself as a victim.
My mother, now she was a victim. She had sacrificed her
career ambitions to her family and to the cultural pressures
of the day. And it was my mother who exerted control by saying
that I or my father couldn't do this or that because it would
hurt or scare her too much. I never acted like that! I
was a strong, outspoken, liberated, self-sufficient, successful
professional woman. I couldn't be a victim.
And then
a realization slowly emerged from the shadows of my psyche.
I had merely created a style that was different from
my mother's, a style that I and my friends found acceptable.
The mechanism itself, though, was identical.
My new vision
proved itself right away. Once I began to act and perceive from
outside the victim form, it had an astonishing effect on my
marriage. If I did not become the victim, lo and behold, I no
longer viewed my husband as the oppressor. In fact, his actions
and intentions looked so different to me, it was as if I had
placed a gargoyle's mask over his face, which I had now finally
removed. Moreover, I saw in terrifying relief the damaging effect
of my victim routine on him. In any fight, no matter how mutually
precipitated, my husband came out the bad guy. And because we
are both melodramatic by nature, much of this was played out
in public. So, over a period of time, many of our friends had
begun to view me as the Good Wife Who Puts Up With It All and
him as the Bully.
And here's
the thing: Since I chose to step out of this pattern of mine,
except for the occasional squabble, my husband and I have stopped
fighting altogether, a circumstance friendly observers might
have thought as likely as hell freezing over. So who had been
most in control of this situation, which had become so devastating
to our marriage and to each of us personally? Who, indeed, had
been victimizing whom?
As long
as I could identify my husband as the monsterthe one who
prevented accomplishment, happiness, peace, creativity, etc.then
I never had to face the part of myself that actually prevented
those things. As long as I could assign blame, I never had to
face the monster in me and take responsibility for my own life
and fate.
When I first
saw this I became desperately depressed. I assumed that if I
couldn't blame that which was outside myself, then I
must be to blame.
And then
the final piece of the puzzle appeared: Blame itself was
the monstera monster with which self-responsibility
could not coexist.
So at last
I faced that monster. And once faced, as monsters always do,
it shrank and shrank until it was a tiny, squeaking little thing.
"Blame
itself was the monster." Or more accurately, the act
of blaming. For it's the act of blaming that "can't
co-exist with self- responsibility"or with freedom
from inner agitation and strained relationships. Abandon the
practice of blaming, and we see the fear melt away that we have
associated with being honest about ourselves and taking the
full measure of responsibility for our emotional and spiritual
condition.
The blamer's
lie is a work of darkness, and it disappears in the light of
truth.
Next, we
will start to examine what resources are at our disposal to
break our thinking out of the box of blame and distorted perceptions...
This article
is part of a serialization of Bonds That Make Us
Free: Healing Our Relationships, Coming to Ourselves by
C. Terry Warner.
Click
here to sign up for Meridian's FREE email updates.
© 2002Meridian
Magazine. All Rights Reserved.
|
| |
|
 |
|
To
find out more about
how to order this book, click the image below.
Bonds
That Make Us Free
by
C. Terry Warner
|
|
About
the Author:
|

Dr. Terry
Warner
Dr.
C. Terry Warner holds a Ph.D. from Yale University and is a
professor of philosophy at Brigham Young University. He has
been a visiting senior member of Linacre College, Oxford University,
and in 1979 founded The Arbinger Institute, a widely respected
group that devotes itself to helping organizations, families,
and individuals. He and his wife, Susan, have ten children.
|
| What
do you think? |
| Share
your thoughts, comments, and impressions about this article.
|
| Related
Articles: |
|
Books
Archive
Bonds
that Make Us Free: Healing Our Relationships, Coming to Ourselves
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7
Part 8
Part 9
Part 10
Part 11
Part 12
Part 13
Part 14
Part 15
Part 16
Part 17
Part 18
Part 19
Part 20
Part 21
Part 22
Part 23
|
Format
for Print
Click Here |
|