Click here to find out more
 

Click Here to Shop  -- Meridian Marketplace

LDSGetaway.com
LDSPro.com




Click here to find out more






Share the article on this page with a friend.
Click here.
Meridian Magazine : : Home

 

Bonds That Make Us Free, Part 17: "I'm Just Not Any Good"
by C. Terry Warner

We will need to consider one more style of excuse-making. It's given a section of its own because it requires a more thorough treatment than the others. It is generally more difficult to recognize as the living of a lie.

We've talked about three styles or story lines in which Jennifer might have carried out her self-betrayal regarding her aunt. In one, she visits her in the hospital proudly conscious of what it's costing her to do it. This we called self-righteousness. In another, she stretches herself beyond all reason to do everything imaginable for her aunt, fretting morning and night over whether she's done enough. This style we called perfectionism. In a third story line she stays at home, insisting it's not fair or right to have to pay such a price for someone who won't even appreciate the visit. We called this style self-assertiveness.

Besides these three story lines, there is available to her another, which we'll call self-disparagement. Jennifer might stay at home, castigating herself for failing to do what she should have done. Imagine her, brooding about what an unworthy person she must be not even to have the gumption to visit a relative who has fallen ill. She feels crummy. She remembers the many times she has disappointed herself this way. She thinks, "More proof that I'm just not one of those courageous, good people who does noble, admirable things for others."

It looks like she's admitting a truth about herself, but not so. Instead, she's putting forward an excuse. She doesn't do what she's supposed to do because, she claims, she's just no good. Blaming oneself can work as an excuse just as well as blaming someone else.

Like all self-betrayers' excuses, this excuse always includes an accusation of others, though more subtly. You can see this in the following story, in which Ardeth is sitting at the piano with her daughter Tiffany.

Ardeth: We pay Mrs. Simpson forty dollars a lesson, and you refuse to practice.

Tiffany: I am practicing!

Ardeth: You're more worried about what you're wearing than about doing the serious work Mrs. Simpson gives you. What good is it for us to make the sacrifice so you can have this good training when you won't make the time count?

Tiffany: You always say that. If you'd quit bugging me all the time, I could practice just fine.

Ardeth: It doesn't do any good to practice a piece incorrectly. You learn to play the wrong way, and then you have to waste a lot more time undoing the bad habits.

Tiffany: I know what I'm doing. You're not the one Mrs. Simpson shows how to do it.

Ardeth: You might as well take the group lesson from Miss Baker for fifteen dollars if you're going to practice it wrong.

Tiffany: If you're so worried about the money, why don't I just stop taking lessons?

Ardeth: Don't fly off the handle. When you get all upset, you can't concentrate on practicing.

Tiffany: I came in this morning and started prac-ticing, and all you can think of is everything I'm doing wrong. I don't even want to play the piano. I could have gotten my blouse pressed in the time you've wasted hassling me for nothing.

Ardeth: You see, you're trying to get out of practicing just like all the other times. You see?

Tiffany: Okay. So I don't want to practice! So I am trying to get out of it by all my little tricks! I am only interested in what I'm going to wear to school so I can impress all the boys. I don't think that playing the piano is the most divine thing people can do. So now are you satisfied? I'm just exactly as rotten as you say I am!

Ardeth: That's all I'm going to take of this, Tiffany Ann Thomas! I do everything I can to help you develop your talents so you won't turn out to be a nothing, and this is what I get. Get practicing, young lady, or you won't be going out with your friends for a month!

Initially, Tiffany countered her mother's charges of poor discipline and neglect by contending she was practicing as well as she could. Then suddenly she shifted, "confessing" to everything that her mother had accused her of. "So now are you satisfied? I'm exactly as rotten as you say I am!" By this stratagem, she robbed her mother's criticisms of their force and gave herself a new and different justification for what she was doing. This was a justification more difficult for Ardeth to deal with than Tiffany's previous arguments. The excuse Tiffany had now was iron-clad: "I can't help what I'm doing because that's just the way I am!"

In this mode of self-presentation the self-disparager appears to confess to being completely at fault. She appears to accept as true the "I am worthless" image. But this is not so much a forthright confession as a strategy for evading responsibility, an excuse for not doing what needs to be done.

When we are caught up in self-betrayal, "admitting" we are unworthy is just one more strategy in our repertoire. It gives us just as good a justification for acting irresponsibly as the strategy of condemning others. It is a powerful maneuver because claiming to be a victim of our make-up or nature is even harder to refute than claiming to be a victim of others. (To call it mistaken seems like telling terminally ill patients that they are exaggerating their illness.)

The maneuver is powerful for another reason. We think that we are being honest, that we are "admitting the truth at last." If we were living a lie before, then surely, we think, we are telling the truth now. Indeed, we can say that although we may not be the wondrous individuals we have made ourselves out to be, we at least are not being hypocrites anymore. We believe we have mustered up the courage to be honest with ourselves. But the truth is, we are taking up this position accusingly and self-victimizingly—and therefore with violence in our hearts. We make people feel guilty for not rescuing us, or for being successful themselves, and thus hold people hostage to our misery (recall Wally's unwillingness to sing in front of his friends, described in Part 11).

We have all met breastbeaters who, convinced of their worthlessness, beat themselves up verbally and emotionally. Breastbeaters are not as purely self- condemning as they look. Theirs is really just another way of playing the victim and nurturing feelings of self-justification. Nietzsche wrote: "When we despise ourselves, we love the despiser in ourselves."

Thus Tiffany said to her mother: "I'm a spoiled and lazy kid wasting your money and trying to impress the boys. I'm just exactly as rotten as you say I am!" By this she blamed not only something inside herself she believed she wasn't responsible for, but her mother also. Tiffany is gaining again that delicious sense of self-justification that for a moment she thought she had almost lost. She wouldn't have admitted it, but she loved the self-despiser in herself.

We can imagine Tiffany play-acting this part just a bit, only half convincing herself of her victimhood. But in many other cases self-disparagers experience themselves rather thoroughly as worthless and unacceptable. They know first-hand—and they are right—that their suffering is real. They are sure of their worthlessness and unacceptability.

Ernie, one of our salesmen who works on straight commission, is constantly down on himself. He's one of those guys who talks himself out of making about half the calls he should be making. And he backs away from opportunities to close a sale.

It seems to me like he's on the verge of tears most of the time, because of the hopelessness of his situation, I guess. I've heard him say, "Nothing breaks my way" and "I can't seem to do anything right." He hates himself for all his failures and yet he keeps failing anyway.

He's said several times he'd like to quit because he's dragging all the rest of us down. One time when I was reviewing his monthly performance, he asked how I could stand to have a person like him around.

Self-condemning guilt like Ernie's can be thought of as self-betrayal on the "pay as you go" plan: If as guilty people we feel terrible enough, then we have paid for the right to keep wallowing in our problems; we do not have to accept responsibility for them. By seeing himself as no good, Ernie grabbed hold of a perfect excuse for not performing. He could not do any better than he did because he was convinced there was something wrong with him—and there was also something wrong with all those others whose example or competition or contempt or rejection of him put success beyond his reach.

Ernie's story raises an issue we should address here. Any one of the styles or story lines we've discussed can dominate a person's life so completely that it seems to define his or her personality and character. Ernie's particular self-disparagement seems at least as enclosing and final as any of the other story lines, even at their worst. Of him we want to exclaim, "That's just the way he is! It's not a matter of his choosing how he will be. So it's foolish to imagine him changing in any fundamental way."

That indeed is how he seems. But against this impression there's something hopeful to keep in mind, which springs from what we are learning about the origin of negative, afflicted attitudes and emotions. To the degree that these attitudes and emotions are accusing and self-excusing, we are responsible for them, and to that very degree we can stop indulging in them. For a lot of people the major question is whether we can escape them. But the whether question is settled: We can escape. The vital and imperative question is how. Even someone like Ernie can abandon his life story line and start afresh, like a writer who junks a novel she's been writing when she realizes she'll never be able to make it work.

NO EXIT?
To the extent we have stricken ourselves with moral blindness and made ourselves unable to tell our counterfeit actions from genuine goodness, we have lost the opportunity to do what is genuinely good. That opportunity has disappeared from the world as we are experiencing it for one simple reason: Everything we can think of to do while in our darkened state will be no more genuine than the acts we're trying to stop doing. Our efforts to get ourselves unstuck only keep us stuck.

Think about Glen in the midst of his Christmas collusion with Becky, fending off her pressures, preoccupied with how he would get his responsibilities at the office completed, and imagining the chaos that would befall the family if they tried to implement all her plans for Christmas projects and activities. In that condition, he could not conceive of responding to her the way he had before the Christmas collusion began. He could not imagine, given the frustrated and accusing feelings in his heart, of delighting in her being, prizing her ideas, wholeheartedly seeking her happiness, wanting never to be out of her company, or welling up with a grateful and generous spirit toward her. He could not cherish her while judging and criticizing her. Becky as he knew her before she became so demanding, he could cherish—but not Becky the way she was now.

You can see Glen's moral blindness in this. The opportunity to do what would have been truly considerate, generous, and caring was hidden from him in the most effective manner possible—by his own self-worried, self-excusing attitude. That opportunity disappeared from the world as he perceived it. It had no place in the interpretation of Becky that he projected onto her. He could not have discerned that opportunity no matter how hard he scanned the situation in front of him. That's what it means to be "in the box"—to be reduced to moral blindness by the darkness of our eyes.

No wonder, then, that he thought his wrongdoing right, or at least excusable. For there lay before him only two main ways to respond to Becky, and both of them were accusing and self-excusing. He could refuse to do much to help her on the Christmas projects and believe he was standing up for what he thought was right. Or he could give in, sacrifice his work and the balance of family activities he kept talking about, and do everything she wanted. These were the possibilities as he saw them—submit, give in, and sacrifice, or stand up, assert himself, and defy. Both of these alternatives are accusing; neither is generous-spirited, kind, happy, or truly willing. Thus, the boxed- in world we experience as self-betrayers offers us opportunities to submit in humiliation or to stick up for ourselves defiantly, which are both self-absorbed actions, but it offers us no chance of simply doing the right thing without concern for ourselves.

***

What has just been described—the condition of moral blindness in which we cannot distinguish between doing the right thing and portraying ourselves (falsely) as doing the right thing—explains why we are stuck. We have no way to test our thoughts and feelings and actions to discover their dishonesty because we have lost touch with the honest thoughts and feelings and actions we would need to compare them to.

Our predicament is not unlike that of the victim of one of those detective- novel burglaries in which the priceless diamond tiara is replaced by a cubic zirconium imitation that looks just like it to the untrained eye. When the owner checks to make sure nothing has happened to her prized possession, she always receives reassurance that it is safe and sound, and she may therefore never discover her loss. In just this way, Glen (of the Christmas story) and Jennifer (refusing to visit her aunt) and Ethan (packing the family van and making the meals) all felt they knew all about what it meant to treat family members kindly. In observing themselves, they could see with their own eyes an individual trying his or her best to be kind in spite of a situation that made it hard. Yet all the while what they were doing was counterfeit and wrong, and what they were thinking and feeling was self-deceived and false.

We shall never get out of this predicament until we can chase the darkness from our eyes, see what's right without distortion, and do the right without counterfeiting it. This requires a change of heart. But how can we change our hearts when we can't even appreciate how much our hearts need changing?

Answering this question, at least in part, is our next purpose.

 

Click here to sign up for Meridian's FREE email updates.


© 2001 Meridian Magazine.  All Rights Reserved.

 

 

To find out more about
how to order this book, click the image below.

Bonds That Make Us Free
by C. Terry Warner

About the Author:


Dr. Terry Warner

Dr. C. Terry Warner holds a Ph.D. from Yale University and is a professor of philosophy at Brigham Young University. He has been a visiting senior member of Linacre College, Oxford University, and in 1979 founded The Arbinger Institute, a widely respected group that devotes itself to helping organizations, families, and individuals. He and his wife, Susan, have ten children.

What do you think?
Share your thoughts, comments, and impressions about this article.
Related Articles:

Books Archive

Bonds that Make Us Free: Healing Our Relationships, Coming to Ourselves
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7
Part 8
Part 9
Part 10
Part 11
Part 12
Part 13
Part 14
Part 15
Part 16

Format for Print
Click Here