|

Bonds That
Make Us Free, Part 7
by C. Terry
Warner
Slipping
Away
It
is possible to observe a person slipping into the hardened, self-absorbed
way of being. The process is apparent in the following story, told
by a young teacher in the South named Jennifer.
When my widowed
aunt was in the hospital for major surgery I thought I ought to
visit her. She needed some company, and I guess I was one of the
few people who was likely to come around.
But I didn't
go. I was going to go this one night, but there was something good
on TV, and I decided I'd only watch a little of it and then go.
When I was watching I started thinking about how hard it would be
to talk to her. I'm young and she's old, and it was pretty obvious
I wouldn't be able to think of much to say.
Another time
I was going to go and I realized when I was thinking about it that
it wasn't really my fault that I couldn't think of anything to say.
She was just plain hard to talk to. She never spent a lot of time
talking to me when I was growing up, and that's the reason we don't
have much of a relationship. Besides, I knew she didn't think too
highly of getting a college degree, which was what I was doing.
So why should
I feel guilty that I didn't visit her? I'm just as alone as she
is, with my folks in the service and all. I figured it would be
best if she went her way and I went mine. I guess we don't take
to each other much.
Trace with me
the germination and growth of Jennifer's accusing emotions-and her
transformation into a somewhat different, I-It kind of person. The
first pivotal moment came when she decided to watch "only a
little" of that television show. A second one occurred when
she failed to jump from the couch, grab her jacket, and head out
the door. These were self-betrayals. They got her noticing defects
in her aunt and other reasons that would explain why she was not
getting up and going to visit her.
One of these
reasons was that Jennifer and her aunt didn't know one another very
well. Another reason was that her aunt had never reached out to
her and made her feel welcome. "I started thinking how hard
it would be to talk to her." It is clear from the tone of Jennifer's
story that this thought brought with it an irritated, somewhat offended
feeling: How else can a person respond when a relative treats her
insensitively? The more Jennifer reflected on her history with this
aunt, the more fussed she became.
Thus, by her
efforts to defend her self-betrayal in her own mind, Jennifer blunted
her sensitivity to her aunt-almost as if she had replaced what she
knew of her aunt with a fictional picture that excused her own unwillingness
to care.
We need to remind
ourselves that Jennifer's urgent, self-absorbed need to justify
what she was doing sprang into being when she betrayed her sense
of what was right to do in regard to her aunt. By this act, she
transformed her attitude and thus herself. That is an astounding
thing to contemplate.
We might be
tempted to take this fact as a reason for discouragement, supposing
that a moral slip can plunge us irretrievably into darkness. But
in actuality it is a source of hope. It means that by desisting
from self-betrayal we can cease having any need to justify ourselves.
We can escape our self- absorption. We can release ourselves from
the I-It condition.
Many will recognize
that self-betrayal, which is my term for the pivotal act by which
we indirectly choose our way of being, captures what was once in
more traditional terms meant by the word sin. For those who understand
its meaning- and many in our culture do not-sin suggests something
about our being, whereas the more superficial description that I
have been using, "doing the wrong thing," does not. Because
this act of sin or self-betrayal, properly understood, alters how
we are, we do not simply act falsely when we betray ourselves or
sin; we are false, false in our being.
This may explain
in part why few people nowadays speak of sin: it lays responsibility
for the kind of people we are becoming squarely upon ourselves and
therefore challenges us, without tact or subtlety, to examine ourselves.
This idea can be frightening when not adequately understood. Who
wants to face up to the fact that they have themselves to thank
for their present muddles and messes? Yet this idea is a key for
solving the deepest and most difficult problems that we struggle
with from day to day. If we care about one another, we must understand
and teach it.
So as not to
put people off unnecessarily, I have adopted the term self- betrayal
to express in an acceptable way something of the meaning of the
word sin. But ultimately the truth needs to be told. Everything
depends upon what we are becoming, and what we are becoming depends
upon how true we are to the deep, gentle, and irrepressible invitation
to do right by our fellow beings and before God.
We All Know
the Difference
When I read that line in the Overstreets' book-"To the
immature, other people are not real"-the words smote me so
swiftly and deftly that I felt sure I was being reminded of something
I knew already. It had the ring of a truth I had been trying to
remember, even at that tender age, a truth I was ashamed to have
forgotten.
I have come
to believe that every normal person has this knowledge, for the
simple reason that our relationships with others cannot be separated
from our identity as individuals. Though some of us may not have
given any thought to it or been willing to admit it, we all have
a sense of the two ways of being and the differences between them.
Sometimes when
I teach these ideas I start out by explaining just a bit about the
two ways of being and then ask those present to call out the words
they might use to describe people who are either more I-It or more
I-You. This is a sample list offered by one group:
|
I-It
|
I-You
|
|
worried
about self
|
interested
in others
|
|
scarcity-minded
|
abundance-minded
|
|
resents
others' success
|
delights
in others' success
|
|
insecure
|
secure,
peaceful
|
|
sees others
as rivals
|
sees others
as friends
|
|
controlling
|
trusting
|
|
manipulative
|
sincere
|
|
concerned
with quantity
|
concerned
with quality
|
|
selfish
|
sharing
|
|
lonely
|
supportive
|
|
reactive
|
solicitous
|
|
guarded
|
open
|
|
anxious
|
assured
|
|
suspicious
|
trusting
|
|
fearful
|
serene
|
|
rigid
|
flexible
|
|
self-centered
|
other-centered
|
|
defensive
|
accommodating
|
Most people
will enthusiastically acknowledge their own desire to possess the
I-You qualities; whether they have thought of themselves as being
moral or religious does not seem to matter. Moreover, when I ask
individuals to tell me about the most influential person in their
lives, they invariably choose someone generous and kind. These are
the personal characteristics we most appreciate and prize in others,
whether or not we manifest them ourselves.
Sometimes very
crusty, old-line businesspeople weep when they realize how difficult
they have been to live with. One of these, hardened from a career
in the New York financial markets, said at the end of our time together,
"I'm going to try softer."
But those are
examples of people who changed their minds. There are some who,
when they consider the issue intellectually, deny that it's good
to be I- You. However, even they infinitely prefer those with I-You
qualities, in spite of their unwillingness to admit it. Years ago
we had as houseguests a prominent scholar and his youthful second
wife. His marriage to her, about a year earlier, had rejuvenated
him; even before their stay with us he had described her reverently
as warm, sensitive, selfless, caring, spontaneous, genuine, and
happy. When we met her, Susan and I felt we had seldom encountered
a more open and welcoming individual.
The scholar
had just read a paper I had written entitled "Anger and Similar
Delusions," in which I asserted that negative emotions such
as anger, resentment, envy, and hatred are not necessary-that we
can live without them and that by indulging in them we deceive ourselves.
He objected vigorously to these ideas. To take away these emotions,
he contended, would be to strip us of the most vivid and interesting
colors of our personalities. He did not see the contradiction in
his position. The bright being sitting next to him was, by his own
account, richer in humanity than anyone he had ever known, yet she
possessed none of the emotional tendencies he insisted a richly
human person must have.
We all know
the difference between a person acting sensitively and a person
hardened toward others. We all know when a person is open, welcoming,
spontaneous, easy, and caring, and conversely when a person is defensive,
insecure, conceited, fearful, controlling, manipulative, arrogant,
or self- centered. Whether we ourselves are open to others or hardened,
we recognize these characteristics. But when we are hardened, we
cannot think very clearly about what we know.
Next, we
will look at some of the fundamental changes that occur as a person
changes from an "I-it" to an "I-you" orientation...
Click
here to sign up for Meridian's FREE email updates.
© 2001 Meridian
Magazine. All Rights Reserved.
|