|

Just
a Scary Guy in a Mask: The Phantom of the Opera
by
Marilyn Green Faulkner
Dear Fellow
Readers:
For a year and
a half I have been writing little essays about the books we read
together, but this month I am stuck. Yes, I know I recommended The
Phantom of the Opera as our May selection. The book was recommended
to me, and I found it on the classics shelf at the bookstore, and
thought it would be fun to read together. But I don't like this
book! The prose is labored, the characters are flimsy, and the moral
value of the book is negligible at best. Why then, is this book
found on the classics shelf?
To find out,
I did a little research about Gaston Leroux, the author of this
and a few dozen other novels, and found in him a character more
fascinating than his fictional creations. Leroux was a Frenchman
who started his career as a journalist. He had a talent for nosing
out a story and the courage to investigate it fully. On one occasion
he achieved an extraordinary scoop by interviewing in his cell a
prisoner accused of a serious crime. To gain access to the prisoner
Leroux disguised himself as a prison anthropologist, producing forged
credentials to back up his pretense. Following the interview he
wrote a brilliant article demonstrating the innocence of the prisoner,
resulting in his eventual release.
As a roving
correspondent for the French newspaper, Le Matin, Leroux
traveled throughout Russia, Europe and Asia, frequently adopting
disguises to infiltrate the scene of the next great story. His adventures
invariably resulted in exciting copy that made him a celebrity,
and the eyes and ears of a nation. He saw Armenians fighting Turks
and the Russians at war with the Japanese. He stood in the erupting
crater of Vesuvius and, in the robes of an Arab, was the only European
witness to the riots in Fez. He attended the trial of Dreyfuss and
visited the court of the Tsar with President Faure. He wrote:
"No one can
equal the reporter's zest for life, since nobody else possesses
such a delight in observation. The reporter watches on the world's
behalf, he is the spy-glass of the world. Oh, how I love my profession!"
Leroux's wife
did not approve of his globetrotting career; however, and in 1907
he gave up reporting to become a full-time novelist. He greatly
admired Arthur Conan Doyle and Edgar Allen Poe, the inventors of
the mystery and horror genres, and modeled his stories after their
styles. In 1911 he published The Phantom of the Opera in
serial form. It received very little attention at the time, though
it was well received. Leroux continued writing his stream of mystery
and horror stories. (His son reported that every time his father
finished a book he would celebrate by shooting a pistol into the
air outside his study!) In 1924 Universal Studio was searching for
a new vehicle for Lon Chaney, who had scored a triumph in The
Hunchback of Notre Dame. The illustrations of the masked phantom,
swinging on the chandelier in the Paris Opera, caught the attention
of studio researchers, and Leroux's story was secured. Leroux lived
to see his obscure work become a major motion picture.
Once in awhile
a fictional character will catch the fancy of the public, and such
was the case with the tormented, talented phantom created by Leroux.
Lon Chaney's inspired portrayal of the monster added to the mystique,
and the moment when the phantom tears off his mask in
the film is still listed as one of the defining scenes in screen
history. The film's popularity undoubtedly inspired the two
stage productions of the Phantom that still run in theaters today.
Andrew Lloyd Weber's musical version catapulted the phantom to the
realm of a cultural icon, and caused Leroux's novel to be reprinted.
Since it is an old book it landed on the classics shelf, but you
won't find greatness here. Just a scary guy in a mask. The stage
versions are far superior to the original story. Perhaps some of
you will see more in this book than I did, and I invite your comments
about this and our other selections.
My advice is
to skip the Phantom and take a look at June's selection, The
Once and Future King, by T.H. White. If you love the legends
of King Arthur and Camelot you'll love this book, which served as
the basis for the Disney movie, The Sword in the Stone. Here
is a list of our readings through the fall of 2002:
| January
2002 |
O Pioneer, Willa Cather |
| February
2002 |
Possession, by A.S. Byatt |
| March 2002 |
The House of Mirth, Elizabeth Wharton |
| April 2002 |
All Quiet on the Western Front, Erich Remarque |
| May 2002 |
The Phantom of the Opera, Gaston Leroux |
| June 2002 |
The Once and Future King, T.H. White |
| July 2002 |
Wuthering Heights, Emily Bronte |
| August
2002 |
This House of Sky, Ivan Doig |
| September
2002 |
The Good Earth, Pearl S. Buck |
If you love
classic literature, join us at the Best Books Club. We read a book
each month and share comments via the internet. To join the Best
Books Club, log on to our website at www.thebestbooksclub.com, or write
me at bestbooks@meridianmagazine.com.
I've had some interesting comments from Best Books Club members:
All Quiet
on the Western Front, by Erich Maria Remarque
I have read your April selection twice and have traveled that part
of France, which of course is the book's local. There were a number
of war books besides those of Erich Maria Remarque, published after
the war. I read many of them as a boy. One was a personal account
of a man who climbed hill 304. Hills 304 and 305 were artillery
observation posts. They overlooked the reaches of the battlefield
at Verdun, and the Argonne Forest, where most of the Americans fought
and died. He wrote that he climbed 304 at dusk, and the place was
impacted, and churned up from thousands of rounds of artillery shells.
He said the soil was saturated with blood to a depth of several
inches from the many thousands on both sides who died there. He
said he thought about this, as he walked around on top of the ridges
between shell holes. And he became frightened of what he thought
were the spirits of the many dead. These two hills had changed hands
many times and were the scenes of the heaviest fighting of the war.
He said he panicked, and he turned and ran as fast as he could off
the very high hill. He said he stopped only after he was completely
exhausted. This story made a deep impression on me when I was a
young boy, as you might well imagine. I thought about it again,
a few years ago, and I decided to go see for myself. I found it
to be just as described. Although there is a monument there now,
the shell holes are still just as they were described. They were
deep enough that it would be difficult to climb out if you fell
in. And the only way to get around was to walk along the narrow
ridges between the holes, just as the author who was there after
the war had done.
Likewise, hill
305 is in the same condition, except the French have placed a large
berm between the monument and "no mans land" to keep the
curious away. The area is posted, and entry is forbidden, and has
been since 1918... From here, you can look across to the North and
see where the famous American "lost patrol" was pinned
down. I met some Germans on the top of 305. I began to converse
with them. I speak no German but they spoke some English. I was
attempting to describe the artillery that made the holes, since
they were too young to know much about the subject. I was not doing
too well. Then one of them took me back down the narrow road and
showed me three live shells he had hidden under a pine tree. I foolishly
picked one up, and then quickly put it back down, when I realized
it was unstable and dangerous. The Germans laughed. And then they
showed me other battlefield paraphernalia they had dug out of the
shell craters that morning.
It was a few
days after I returned to San Diego that I read in our local paper,
how two French sailors on leave had been blown-up, while digging
in these same old shell holes at Verdun.
We Were Soldiers
Once, And Young, by Lt. Gen Harold Moore
My review of this harrowing retelling of one of the major battles
in Vietnam inspired a veteran of the conflict to write this moving
tribute:
I served
personally under Col. Moore and he was a true caring professional.
He exhibited great compassion and concern constantly for all of
his men. Those who survived those horrible battles at Ia Drang
all showed great respect for Col. Moore. In many cases considered
him a father 'Protector' figure and commented that if they were
asked to go back into that Valley of Death they wanted Col. Moore
as their leader. I concur. His assignments were completed as directed
but not without the personal challenges of his internal feelings,
as we all had. As far as Humility, I would say it all depends
on how you intended to use the word. It can be used to describe
a form of humbleness but I would say it is a better descriptor
as a kind of selflessness or modesty.
Phil Anderson
A Co. 2nd Bn 7th Cav '66
Possession,
by A.S. Byatt
Marilyn, I just read the exchange of letters between Ash and
Christabel at lunch today where they discuss faith. Doesn't this
sound familiar, "The truth is--my dear Miss LaMotte--that we
live in an old world--a tired world--a world that has gone on piling
up speculation and observations until truths that might be graspable
in the bright Dayspring of human morning. . .are now obscured by
palimpsest on palimpsest, by thick horny growths over that clear
vision...." And then Christabel replies in her letter, "I
do not dispute your vision of our historical Situation--we are far
from the Source of Light--and we know Things--that make a Simple
Faith--hard to hold, hard to wrestle, hard to grasp....But of the
true tale of the Son you say wondrous little--and yet that lies
at the Centre of our living faith--the Life and Death of God made
man, our true Friend and Saviour, the model of our conduct, and
our hope, in his Rising from the Dead, of a future life for all
of us, without which the failing and manifest injustice of our earthly
span would be an intolerable mockery." Wow!!!
Click
here to sign up for Meridian's FREE email updates.
© 2002Meridian
Magazine. All Rights Reserved.
|